Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 7, Issue 4, 2020, pp. 01-12

Angelica archangelica extract ameliorates the oxidative stress induced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in rats

Fatma A. Ibrahim1, Noha A. Abd El-Latif1, Manal S. Selim2, Sahar S. Mohamed2, Sherif A. A. Moussa1

1Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth Street, Dokki, Giza, Egypt (Affiliation ID: 60014618)
2Microbial biotechnology Department, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth Street, Dokki, Giza, Egypt (Affiliation ID: 60014618)
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2020.v7.i04.pp01-12 | Published: 2020-10-15 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of Angelica archangelica roots aqueous extract on Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria. The antimicrobial activity of different concentrations of Angelica was assessed in vitro on two strains of yeast and two strains of fungi. P. aeruginosa antibiotics resistance was confirmed against three antibiotics. Results demonstrated that Angelica had very high activity on the growth of P. aeruginosa. To confirm this activity in vivo, four groups of male wistar albino rats were used. Control group received water only, infection group subjected to bacterial infection for two weeks, treatment group subjected to bacterial infection for two weeks followed by oral administration of Angelica archangelica roots extract for two other weeks and protection group subjected to bacterial infection with oral administration of Angelica archangelica extract for two weeks. At the end of experiment, histopathological examination of kidney and liver specimens was carried out; also blood samples were collected to measure biochemical and oxidative stress parameters. Amelioration of the histological images of both the liver and kidney were observed in both group 3 &4. Biochemical results showed significant enhancement in all parameters measured in group 3 & 4 as compared to group 2. Results were more abundant in group 4 than group 3. In conclusion, Angelica archangelica roots aqueous extract has the potential to remove the oxidative stress caused by P. aeruginosa which resulted in enhancement of histopathological and biochemical results.

Keywords: Angelica archangelica; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Antibacterial; Antioxidant

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; gram negative bacteria attributed to the genus pseudomonas is a widespread microorganism. P. aeruginosa has toxic and pathogenic effects and is responsible for several nosocomial and community acquired infectious diseases [1]. This is related to the high mortality rate in infected patients [2].

Pseudomonas species has the ability to transmit form one organ to another. If it persists in the intestine, it can move to the liver, spleen and mesenteric lymph nodes in mice treated with streptomycin antibiotic [3].

The increase in usage of multi antibiotics in fighting the emergence of multi drug resistant microorganisms [4]. This antibiotics resistance leads to toxicity and consequently decline in the use of these drugs. P. aeruginosa has the ability to live in different environments and is resistant to most antibiotics due to its capability to form biofilms [5]. Although vaccination with microbial antigens could be an effective method for protective host responses in most infectious diseases, in this organism vaccination is unsuccessful due to the immune deficiency [6].

In traditional medicine, there was a trend to use plants in the treatment of burns and infectious diseases. This field of medicinal plants treatment returned again to kill Phototherapy research; a new field that attracted investigators interest in recent years to use medicinal plants extracts to fight these multi resistant microorganisms [8]. That is considered as a promising source of drugs and a new approach of treatment [9]. Hence, a number of natural products have been chosen and approved as antimicrobial drugs. As more pathogens have resistance against most antibiotics, more research is needed to find highly effective natural products to kill these pathogens [10].

Angelica is widespread and well known plants that were used in medical treatment for centuries. It is a nonchemical antioxidant. Angelica archangelica [Family: Umbelliferae (Apiaceae)] is an exceedingly planted Angelica grass that has been applied in traditional medicine as a medication for assorted disorders like: headaches, backaches, asthma, skin diseases and digestive troubles. Archangelica comes from the Greek word ‘arkhangelos’ (=arch-angel), due to the myth that it was the angel Gabriel who told of its use as a medicine [11]. Due to its chemical constituents including essential oils, organic acids, steroids, coumarines and flavonoids, diverse pharmacological actions of the plant root partition have been studied. Angelica archangelica root was reported to have analgesic, antiseptic, anti-inflammatory, antifungal, antispasmodic, and anti-cancer cell proliferative properties as well as calcium channel blocking and calcium binding activity. Angelica archangelica root contains several essential oils such as; pynene, limonene and coumarin that some scientists proved that the previous component may accelerate antioxidant effects. [12].

Catechins cause damage of the cell membrane of the bacteria, inhibition of the synthesis of fatty acids and inhibition of enzyme activity. Also, they have antiinflammatory effect (specially the inflammation caused by oxidative stress) [13]. Bacterial cell membrane damage inhibits the ability of the bacteria to bind to host cells [14] and restrains the bacterial capability to bind to each other to biofilms formations which are strong effect in pathogenesis. Also, bacterial membrane injury results in the bacteria inability to secrete toxins [15].

The goal of this research was to examine the effect of Angelica archangelica roots water extract on the oxidative stress caused by oral bacterial infection of rats (protective and treatment effects). The bacteria used in this study, P. aeruginosa, were obtained from the microbiology lab, National Research Center, Dokki, Egypt.

Material and methods

Plant extraction preparation

The roots of Angelica archangelica (whole root) were provided by Mr. Haraz (Famous oldest Egyptian herbs and folk medicine manufactures and supplies, Cairo, crushed. Boiled distilled water was added to roots. After cooling, juice was filtered three times. The obtained solution was used in a base of body weight as 5 ml for each kg body [16]. In this study water extract was used because it is easy to prepare and contains all components required in the roots of Angelica archangelica.

In vitro antimicrobial activities

Four kinds of pure strains of bacteria, Bacillus subtilisNRRL B-941(G+ve), Staphylococcus aureus NRRL B- 767 (G+ve), Pseudomonas aeruginosa NRRL B-23 (G- ve), Escherichia coli-NRR-B 210(G-ve), two strains of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y-2034 and Candida albicans NRRL Y-477, and two strains of fungi Aspergillus niger NRRL -3 and Fusarium oxysporum NRRL 26406 were plated out in nutrient agar medium for bacteria and yeast, malt extract agar medium for fungi and were employed as described by Harrigan [17].

The antimicrobial activity was determined according to Barry [18]. For bacteria and yeast, the liquid media were used for 18 to 24 h (Harvested at the logarithmic phase of growth, at absorbance 600 nm). For fungi, the liquid media were used for approximately 72 h and the spore density of each fungus was adjusted at 595nm.

The inhibition zone method was prepared and adapted using filter paper discs of 0.5 cm diameter. The solid media were sterilized and divided at 50ºC into 30 ml portion in sterile petri-dishes of 15cm diameter. For the 8 inoculums of the tested organism, 1.0 ml of cells (2x10 5 CFU/ml) for bacteria and yeast, and for fungi 10 spores/cells were added to the surface of the medium. Aliquots of different concentrations of Angelica extract (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 120 g/l) were placed on filter paper disks. Disks were placed carefully on the surface of the inoculated solid medium. The petri-dishes were placed in the refrigerator for 2 h to permit good diffusion and then transferred to an incubator at 37ºC for 24 h for the bacteria and at 28ºC for 72 h for fungi and yeast growth. The plates were then examined and the inhibition zones produced by different concentration of Angelica were determined. Rimactane as antibiotic (200 μg/disc) and Flucoral as antifungal (200 μg/disc) were used as antibiotic reference.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antibiotic resistance assessment

According to Barry [18] as mentioned above, different antibiotics such as Rimactane, gentamicin, piperacillin and ZOSYN (piperacillin and tazobactam) (200 μg/disc) were used for the detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance.

The pathogenesis of pseudomonal infections is multifactorial and complex. Pseudomonas species are both invasive and toxigenic. The 3 stages are (1) bacterial attachment and colonization, (2) local infection, and (3) bloodstream dissemination and systemic disease. The importance of colonization and adherence is most evident when studied in the context of respiratory tract infection in patients with cystic fibrosis and in those that complicate mechanical ventilation. Common symptoms of the infections include: skin: Rashes, which may consist of pus-filled pimples, eyes: Pain and redness, Soft tissue: Discharge of green pus and a sweet, fruity smell and other possible symptoms: diarrhea, or urinary tract infection.

In-vivo assay

Forty eight male Albino rats (10-12 weeks old) weighing about 120 to 150 gm were obtained from animal house, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt). They were kept under standard laboratory conditions with ad-libitum access to food and water in well-ventilated cages made of galvanized zinc plates and ate bread and drunk water. Before experiment, the rats divided into four cages under stable temperature, suitable light and good feeding for seven days before experiment, after that body weight determined and observe the health status and psychological behavior of the rats to begin the experiment. Experimental animal design was previously approved by the National Research Center ethical committee.

(Male rats tolerate the infection pain in the stomach than females because male rats aren't as hormonal as females—because isn't that what they always say—and are therefore more reliable in terms of getting data and they don't have estrous cycles that can complicate pharmacology; and in many fields, there is a significantly larger body of literature and data sets on).

The animals were divided into four groups of twelve each as follows; Group 1 (G1): Control group; with daily water administration only.

Group 2 (G2): Infection group; subjected to bacterial infection alone for two weeks in a dose of 1.3X107 CFU/ml/animal (One ml of bacterial suspension/day). Group 3 (G3): Treatment group; subjected to bacterial infection for two weeks as above followed by oral administration of Angelica archangelica roots water extract (One ml of plant water extract/day) for two weeks. Group 4 (G4): Protection group; subjected to bacterial infection with concurrent oral administration of Angelica archangelica roots water extract for two weeks.

At the end of experiment, blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital venous plexus of all animals into heparinized tubes. The plasma obtained after centrifugation (3000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C) was used for malondialdehyde (MDA) and catalase determination. Erythrocytes were washed three times in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution. Lysed erythrocytes were prepared by addition of four volumes of ice-cold distilled water. Cell membranes were removed by centrifugation at the assay of GSH concentration and antioxidant enzymes activities. According to the antioxidant assays, appropriate phosphate buffers of pH 7 for glutathione peroxidase and pH 8.5 for SOD were added to the hemolysate samples; therefore, the antioxidant enzymes do not lose their activities.

Histopathological examination of kidney and liver tissues

Kidney and liver specimens of all animals were dissected immediately after death and fixed in 10% neutralbuffered formal saline for 72 hours at least. All the specimens were washed in tap water for half an hour and then dehydrated in ascending grades of alcohol (70% - 80% - 90% and finally absolute alcohol), cleared in xylene, impregnated in soft paraffin wax at 55°C and embedded in hard paraffin. Serial sections of 6 μm thick were cut and stained with Hematoxylin and eosin [19] for histopathological investigation. Ten micrometer sections cut from paraffin tissues stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and the investigation of the tissues was done by light microscope. Images were captured and processed using Adobe Photoshop version 8.0.

Biochemical assays

For biochemical analysis specially manufactured kits were used.

Reduced Glutathione (GSH) concentration

GSH concentration was determined spectrophoto metrically according to the method of Beutler [20]. The method is based on the reduction of 5,5 dithiobis (2- nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) with GSH to produce a yellow compound. The reduced chromogen is directly proportional to GSH concentration and its absorbance can be measured at 405 nm.

Plasma Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration

MDA concentration was determined spectrophoto metrically by the method of Satoh [21]. Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reacts with MDA in acidic medium at temperature of 95°C for 30 min to form thiobarbituric acid reactive product. The absorbance of the resulting pink product can be measured at 534 nm.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in cell lysate

SOD activity in cell lysate was determined spectrophotometrically by the method of Nishikimi et al. [22]. The principle of this assay relies on the ability of the enzyme to inhibit the phenazine methosulphate-mediated reduction of nitro-blue tetrazolium dye. The percent inhibition directly proportional to SOD activity was calculated.

Table 1. Inhibition zones (mm) of microbial growth (bacterial species) by different concentrations of Angelica.
Table 1. Inhibition zones (mm) of microbial growth (bacterial species) by different concentrations of Angelica.

Erythrocyte glutathione reductase (GSH-R) activity

GSH-R activity was determined by the method of Goldberg and Spooner [23].

Catalase determination

Catalase enzyme reacts with a known quantity of H2O2 [24]. The reaction is stopped after exactly one minute with catalase inhibitor.

2H2O2 + Catalase 2H2O + O2.

Glutathione Peroxidase determination

In the presence of peroxidase (HPR), any remaining H2O2 reacts with 3,5-Dichloro -2-hydroxybenzene sulfonic acid (DHBS) and 4-aminophenazone (AAP) to form a chromophore with a color intensity inversely proportional to the amount of catalase in the original sample [25].

2H2O2 + DHBS + AAP HPR Quinoneimine Dye + 4H2O.

GST Activity

GST activity was determined spectrophotometrically by method of Habig et al. [26]. The biodiagnostic GST assay kit measures total GST activity (Cytosolic and microsomal) by measuring the conjugation of 1-chloro2,4-dinirobenzene (CDNB) with reduced glutathione (GSH). The conjugation is accompanied by an increase in absorbance at 340 nm. The rate of increase is directly proportional to the GST activity in the sample.

Liver Enzymes

Alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) activities were determined by the method of Reitman and Frankel [27].

Creatinine

Creatinine in alkaline solution reacts with picric acid to form a colored complex [28]. The amount of the complex formed is directly proportional to the creatinine measured at 492 nm.

Statistical Analysis

Data were presented as the mean + Standard error (SE) values. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out, and the statistical comparisons among the groups were performed with Post Hoc and the least significant difference (LSD) tests using a statistical package for social science (SPSS version 20). P < 0.001 was considered as statistically significant.

Result

Antimicrobial activities

The antimicrobial activities are shown in Tables (1 & 2). The results demonstrate that Angelica possessed antimicrobial activities against the tested microorganisms except A. Niger and F. oxysporum. Angelica had very high activity on the growth of P. aeruginosa, E. coli, B. subtilis, Staph. aureus, S. cerevisiae respectively. Similarly, the effect of commonly used Rimactane as antibiotic and Flucoral as antifungal was tested against these microorganisms for comparison with Angelica. The highest antimicrobial activity 11.7 mm was observed in P. aeruginosa and with increasing the concentration of Angelica the zone of inhibition increased till reached 24.8 mm.

Therefore, the activities were depending on Angelica concentrations. Also P. aeruginosa was highly affected by Angelica as an antimicrobial agent when compared with the antibiotic Rimactane.

Antibiotic resistance

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a notoriously difficult organism to control with antibiotics as seen in Table 3. The zone of inhibition varied among them. However, they all showed weak inhibition when compared with Angelica (24.8 mm).

Table 2. Inhibition zones (mm) of microbial growth (yeast and fungal species) by different concentrations of Angelica.
Table 2. Inhibition zones (mm) of microbial growth (yeast and fungal species) by different concentrations of Angelica.
Table 3. Antibiotic resistance.
Table 3. Antibiotic resistance.

weight during the period of oral administration of bacteria (P < 0.01) compared with healthy control group (G1), but in protected group (G3) and treated group (G4), there were only slight difference in their weight compared to healthy control group (G1).

In this study, the effect of P. aeruginosa gastrointestinal infection as well as the protective and therapeutic influences of Angelica archangelica were assessed using histopathological and biochemical investigations.

Histopathological alterations in different groups

Kidney and liver tissues from all groups were histopathologically examined to show the different changes in tissues among infected, protected and treated groups as compared with normal tissues.

Examination of kidney tissues revealed normal structure in healthy control group (G1) as shown in Figure 1.

Whereas interstitial hemorrhage and vascular degeneration of epithelial lining cells of many tubules were observed in infected group (G2) Figure 2. In the treated group (G3) Figure 3, the kidney tissues showed the decrease in interstitial hemorrhage and slight vascular degeneration. The interstitial hemorrhage was still observed in the protection group to a greater degree than

Biochemical investigations

Effect of P. aeruginosa oral administration on oxidative stress markers, liver enzymes and kidney functions in experimental rats was investigated (Table 4). The protective and therapeutic influences of Angelica archangelica on the same parameters were evaluated. The results describe the effect of ingested P.aeurginosa on the biochemical parameters and shows, in infected groups, increase in MDA and creatinine levels in addition to increase in glutathione peroxidase, ALT and AST activities. On the other hand, there is a decrease in reduced glutathione and glutathione reductase, glutathione S-transferase and catalase activities with highly significant values compared with healthy control groups.

In treated and protected groups, there were significant enhancement in the results (P<0.001) compared to infected group but the removal of oxidative stress caused by P. aeruginosa in protected group is greater than that in the treated group.

1. A photomicrograph of a section of normal kidney tissue shows the normal structure of this tissue being formed

embedded in between tubules. The right lower corner shows

Figure 2. A photomicrograph of a section of infected kidney tissue shows marked interstitial hemorrhage (arrows), thickening of the blood vessels’ walls (wavy arrow) and vacuolar degeneration of epithelial lining cells of many tubules.
Figure 2. A photomicrograph of a section of infected kidney tissue shows marked interstitial hemorrhage (arrows), thickening of the blood vessels’ walls (wavy arrow) and vacuolar degeneration of epithelial lining cells of many tubules.

at a higher magnification

Figure

of glomeruli

The right lower corner of the figure shows –

X 100, 200).

- at a higher magnification - the epithelial cells

– vacuolar degeneration in tubular cells (Hx & E

3. A photomicrograph of a section of treated rat’s kidney tissue shows marked decrease in interstitial hemorrhage (arrow). Most of the tubular lining epithelial cells appear normal except for a few cells that still show vacuolar A photomicrograph of a section of protected kidney tissue shows normalization of tubular lining cells, while the interstitial hemorrhage is still observed in a greater degree than in the treated group (arrow) (Hx & E X 200).

Figure

degeneration (arrowhead) (Hx & E X 200).

Figure 5. A photomicrograph of a section of normal liver tissue shows the central vein (CV) and the hepatocytes arranged in cords radiating from the central vein (Hx &amp; E X 200).
Figure 5. A photomicrograph of a section of normal liver tissue shows the central vein (CV) and the hepatocytes arranged in cords radiating from the central vein (Hx & E X 200).

A photomicrograph of a section of infected liver tissue shows massive dilatation of blood vessels with fibrosis and cellular infiltration around (arrow). The normal architecture of the tissue is markedly distorted (Hx & E X 100).

A photomicrograph of a section of treated rat’s liver tissue shows normalization of the tissue structure except

for slight dilatation of blood sinusoids (arrowhead) (Hx & E X 400).

Table 4. S hows the oxidative stress markers, liver enzymes and kidney fu nction in different groups (G1, G2, G3 and G4).
Table 4. S hows the oxidative stress markers, liver enzymes and kidney fu nction in different groups (G1, G2, G3 and G4).

P. aeruginosa naturally lives in the environment, so it is associated with human infection [29, 30]. P. aeruginosa is gram-negative bacteremia and is considered as the fourth cause of primary hospital acquired infections. P.

have been implicated in its pathogenicity [31]. The bacterium is a pragmatic pathogenic organism, primarily causing nosocomial infections in immunocompromised patients [32, 33]. It has the ability to give rise to a widespectrum of infections as disruption of normal physiological function occurs including deteriorated epithelial barriers [34], depleted neutrophil production [35], altered mucociliary clearance [36] P. aeruginosa is scarcely correlated with chronic infections in formerly healthy patients [37, 38]. It is highly antibiotic resistant and can cause high frequencies of mortality [39].

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is responsible for 10–15 % of the nosocomial infections worldwide [40]. Often these infections are hard to treat due to the natural resistance of the species, as well as to its remarkable ability of acquiring further mechanisms of resistance to multiple groups of antimicrobial agents. P. aeruginosa represents a phenomenon of antibiotic resistance, and demonstrates practically all known enzymic and mutational mechanisms of bacterial resistance [41].

According to screening studies of antimicrobial activity of plant extracts and natural products, higher plants act as essential and important source of new antimicrobial natural components [42]. As antibacterial medications are going through a crisis due to the quickly accelerating antibiotic resistance, new antimicrobial agents are urgently needed against resistant strains from the pool of bacteria which continuously undergo genetic changes. In addition to possible antimicrobial properties against human pathogens, it is also of interest to determine whether these extracts or compounds possess activity against plant pathogens [43].

P. aeruginosa has permanently been deemed to be a hard goal for antimicrobial chemotherapy. However, the entire sequencing of a P. aeruginosa wild-type strain has extended a big deal of beneficial information, regarding not only its pathogenicity, but also its resistance power [44]. Several possible mechanisms stand behind P. aeruginosa resistance to many types of antibiotics including its outer-membrane low permeability, the constitutive expression of various efflux pumps, and the production of antibiotic-inactivating enzymes (e.g., cephalosporinases) [45]. Moreover, P. aeruginosa also has a noteworthy capability to gain new antibiotics resistance mechanisms. This may due to the big size and the inconstancy of its genome, and to its distribution in aqueous media, which act as a reservoir for bacteria with other resistance bacterial genes [46].

In this study, the first step carried out was the in vitro antibacterial activity assay [47]. As observed, Angelica roots had strong antimicrobial activity against different bacteria and yeasts as mentioned above. Although P. aeruginosa was resistant to different antibiotics like Rimactane, gentamicin, piperacillin and ZOSYN, it was greatly affected by Angelica. Many reports focused on the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of P. aeruginosa and highlighted the problem of antibiotic resistance [45, 48]. The high antimicrobial activity of Angelica may be attributed to the main constituents of the essential oils of Angelica which possess antimicrobial effect against activities are mainly attributed to its coumarin content [43]. Coumarins produced by the plant are considered as a defense mechanism against microrganisms [50, 51]. Coumarin compounds could be beneficial to the plants themselves as natural anti-pathogenic compounds, and for human as dietary supplements depending on their mild antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects, and as reference compounds in various bioactivity tests [52]. Also this study, histopathological investigation of the kidney and liver tissues in infected group with P. aeruginosa showed marked damage caused by bacteria. On the other hand, kidney and liver tissues in rats treated with Angelica extract showed recovery of these tissues and protective groups showed normal tissues appearance as compared with normal group. These results proved the effect of Angelica extract as antibacterial herb where it inhibited the pathogenic action of P. aeruginosa.

Yeh et al [53] found that angelica archangelica inhibited the formation of malondialdehyde in homogenates of mouse liver both in vitro and in vivo. Angelica archangelica had cytoprotective effect against chronic ethanol-induced hepatotoxicity, possibly through the inhibition of the production of oxygen free radicals that cause lipid peroxidation, and hence indirectly protects the liver from oxidative stress. In treatment and protection groups, the concentration of malondialdhyde was decreased. These results illustrate the antibacterial action of Angelica extraction. In this study, malondialdhyde concentration increased in the infected rats group compared with normal healthy group showing the pathogenic effect of p. aeruginosa which led to lipid peroxidation as a result of oxidative stress which appears due to bacterial infection.

One of the most notable observations in the present study was the antioxidant effect of Angelica Archangelica where in both treated and protected groups, there were significant enhancement in the results compared to infected group but the removal of oxidative stress caused by P. aeruginosa in protected group was greater than that in the treated group. The levels of antioxidants in protective group appeared higher than that of treated group.

Clinically, P. aeruginosa bacteremia looks like other forms of gram negative sepsis; with hypotension, fever, refractory shock, adult respiratory syndrome, and renal failure as common symptoms [39]. In our study, the levels of liver enzymes and kidney function tests in the infected group were significantly higher as compared with the normal group. These results prove the hazardous effect of P. aeruginosa on hepatic and renal functions. In the treatment and protection groups, these functions were improved as compared with infected group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study showed the benefit of Angelica Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria which is a strong antibiotic resistant bacterium. Also, Angelica Archangelica extract protect and treat the damage in infected liver and kidney tissues and this extract effective to protect and treat the oxidative stress caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial infection.

References

References

  1. Daneman N, Elligsen M, Walker SA and Simor A: Duration of hospital admission and the need for empirical antipseudomonal therapy. Journal of clinical microbiology 2012; 50(8):2695-2701.
  2. Poole K: Pseudomonas aeuriginosa: resistant to the max. Front microbial. 2011; 2-6.
  3. Hentges DJ, STEM AJ, Case SW and Onderdon KA: Protective role of intestinal flora against infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mice: Influence of antibiotics on colonization resistance. Infect. Immune. 1980; 47: 118-122.
  4. Nakamura I., Yamaguchi T., Tsukimori A., Sato A., Fukushima S, Mizuno Y and Matsumoto T: Effectiveness of antibiotic combination therapy as evaluated by the Break-point Checkerboard Plate method for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in clinical use. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2014; 20(4):266-269.
  5. Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Bumgarner RE, Parsek MR, Teitzel GM, Lory S and Greenberg EP: Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 2001; 413(6858):860-864.
  6. Matsumoto T, Ishikawa H, Tateda K, Yaeshima T, Ishibashi N and Yamaguchi K: Oral administration of Bifidobacterium longum prevents gut‐derived Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in mice. Journal of applied microbiology 2008; 104(3):672-680.
  7. Bonjar GS, Nik AK. Antibacterial activity of some medicinal plants of Iran against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. fluorescens. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2004; 3:61-64.
  8. Radji M, Agustama RA, Elya B and Tjampakasari CR: Antimicrobial activity of green tea extract against isolates of methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multi–drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine 2013; 3(8):663-667.
  9. Al-Mariri A and Safi M: In vitro antibacterial activity of several plant extracts and oils against some gram-negative bacteria. Iranian journal of medical sciences 2014; 39(1):36-43.
  10. Cragg GM, Newman DJ and Snader KM: Natural products in drug discovery and development. J. Natural Prod. 1997; 60:52-60.
  11. Sarker SD and Nahar L: Natural medicine: the genus Angelica. Current medicinal chemistry 2004; 11(11):1479-1500.
  12. Nivinskiene O, Butkiene R and Mockutë D: Changes in the chemical composition of essential oil of Angelica archangelica L. roots during storage. Chemija (Vilnius). 2003; 14(1):52-56.
  13. Reygaert WC: The antimicrobial possibilities of green tea. Frontiers in microbiology 2014; 5: 434-438.
  14. Sharma A, Gupta S, Sarethy IP, Dang S and Gabrani R: Green tea extract: possible mechanism and antibacterial activity on skin pathogens. Food chemistry 2012; 135(2):672-675.
  15. Ramachandran G: Gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial toxins in sepsis: a brief review. Virulence. 2014; 5(1):213-218.
  16. Bassem MR, Abd El-Baset MS, and Amira SR: Using of Angelica officinalis roots powder as a chelating agent of lead in rats. Medical J Cairo University 2005; 149-156.
  17. Harrigan WF: Laboratory Methods in Food Microbiolgy. 3rd Edh. Academic Press, San Digo, London, Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo and Toronto. (1998).
  18. Barry AL: Procedure for testing antimicrobial agents in agar medium: Theoretical considerations. In: Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, (Ed, V. Lorian). Williams & Wilkins, the University of Michigan, US. (1986) 1-26.
  19. Drury RAB and Wallington FA: Corleton’s Histological Technique 4th Ed. Oxford, New York, Toronto, Oxford university press. (1980)
  20. Beutler E: Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione. J. lab. Clin. Med. 1963; 61:882-888.
  21. Kei S: Serum lipid peroxide in cerebrovascular disorders determined by a new colorimetric method. Clinica chimica acta 1978; 90(1):37-43.
  22. Nishikimi M, Rao NA and Yagi K: The occurrence of superoxide oxygen. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 1972; 46(2):849-54.
  23. Goldberg D.M and Spooner RJ: Methods of Enzymatic analysis (Brgmeyen, HV ED). Verlog Chemie, Deerfield beach, Fl. 3rd edn. Vol. 3. (1983) 258-256.
  24. Aebi H: Catalase in vitro. Methods in enzymology 1984; 105:121-
  25. . Academic Press.
  26. Paglia DE and Valentine WN: Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine 1967; 70(1):158-169.
  27. Habig WH, Pabst MJ and Jakoby WB: Glutathione S-transferases the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Journal of biological Chemistry 1974; 249(22):7130-7139.
  28. Reitman S and Frankel S: A colorimetric method for the determination of serum glutamic oxalacetic and glutamic pyruvic transaminases. American journal of clinical pathology. 1957; 28(1):56-63.
  29. Bartels H, Böhmer M, Heierli C. Serum creatinine determination without protein precipitation. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 1972; 37:193.
  30. Coggan KA and Wolfgang MC: Global regulatory pathways and cross-talk control Pseudomonas aeruginosa environmental lifestyle and virulence phenotype. Current issues in molecular biology 2012; 14(2):47-70.
  31. Pirnay JP, Matthijs S, Colak H, Chablain P, Bilocq F, Van Eldere J, De Vos D, Zizi M, Triest L and Cornelis P: Global Pseudomonas aeruginosa biodiversity as reflected in a Belgian river. Environmental microbiology 2005; 7(7):969-80.
  32. Meinke G, Barum J, Rosenberg B and Berk R: In vivo studies with the partially purified protease (elastase) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection and immunity 1970; 2(5):583-589.
  33. Defez C, Fabbro-Peray P, Bouziges N, Gouby A, Mahamat A, Daures JP and Sotto A: Risk factors for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial infection. Journal of Hospital Infection 2004; 57(3):209-216.
  34. Brown SP, Cornforth DM and Mideo N: Evolution of virulence in opportunistic pathogens: generalism, plasticity, and control. Trends in microbiology 2012; 20(7):336-342.
  35. Engel J and Balachandran P: Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III effectors in disease. Current opinion in microbiology 2009; 12(1):61-
  36. Bodey GP: Microbiologic aspects in patients with leukemia. Human pathology 1974; 5(6):687-698.
  37. Koch C and Hoiby N: Pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis. Lancet 1993; 341:1065-1069.
  38. Huhulescu S, Simon M, Lubnow M, Kaase M, Wewalka G, Pietzka AT, Stöger A, Ruppitsch W and Allerberger F: Fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in a previously healthy woman was most likely associated with a contaminated hot tub. Infection 2011; 39(3):265-269.
  39. Hatchette TF, Gupta R and Marrie TJ: Pseudomonas aeruginosa community-acquired pneumonia in previously healthy adults: case report and review of the literature. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2000; 31(6):1349-1356.
  40. Pollack M: Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Principles and Practice of infectious diseases. 1995:1980-2003.
  41. Blanc DS, Petignat C, Janin B, Bille J and Francioli P: Frequency and molecular diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa upon admission and during hospitalization: a prospective epidemiologic study. Clinical microbiology and infection 1998; 4(5):242-247.
  42. Pechère JC and Köhler T: Patterns and modes of β-lactam resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinical microbiology and infection 1999; 5:S15-S18.
  43. Press JB. Biodiversity: exciting prospects for drug discovery and development. Chemtracts organic chemistry 1996; 9:286-298.
  44. Ojala T, Remes S, Haansuu P, Vuorela H, Hiltunen R, Haahtela K, Vuorela P. Antimicrobial activity of some coumarin containing herbal plants growing in Finland. Journal of ethnopharmacology 2000; 73(1-
  45. :299-305.
  46. Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, Brinkman FS, Hufnagle WO, Kowalik DJ, Lagrou M, Garber RL. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 2000; 406(6799):959-964.
  47. Hancock RE. Resistance mechanisms in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1998; 27(Supplement_1):S93-S99.
  48. Vaisvila R, Morgan RD, Posfai J and Raleigh EA: Discovery and distribution of super‐integrons among Pseudomonads. Molecular
  49. Tona L, Kambu K, Ngimbi N, Cimanga K and Vlietinck AJ. Antiamoebic and phytochemical screening of some Congolese medicinal plants. Journal of ethnopharmacology 1998; 61(1):57-65.
  50. Henwood CJ, Livermore DM, James D, Warner M, Pseudomonas Study Group T. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: results of a UK survey and evaluation of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy disc susceptibility test. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2001; 47(6):789-799.
  51. Fraternale D, Flamini G, Ricci D. Essential oil composition and antimicrobial activity of Angelica archangelica L. (Apiaceae) roots. Journal of medicinal food 2014; 17(9):1043-1047.
  52. Berenbaum MR, Nitao JK, Zangerl AR. Adaptive significance of furanocoumarin diversity inPastinaca sativa (Apiaceae). Journal of chemical ecology 1991; 17(1):207-215.
  53. Weinmann I. History of the development and applications of coumarin and coumarin-related compounds. Coumarins: biology, applications and mode of action. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY. 1997:1-
  54. Tiina O: Biological Screening of Plant Coumarins. Academic Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Faculty of Science, Department of Pharmacy, Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, 2001; 21-22.
  55. Yeh ML, Liu CF, Huang CL, Huang TC. Hepatoprotective effect of Angelica archangelica in chronically ethanol-treated mice. Pharmacology 2003; 68(2):70-73.