Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 3, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 164-170

Isolation and characterization of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi from salt affected soils and compost

Mohamed F. Eida1, Ibrahim A. Matter1, Fatma H. Abd El Zaher1

1Agricultural Microbiology Department, National Research Center, Giza, Egypt
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2016.v3.i04.pp164-170 | Published: 2016-10-05 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Lignocellulosic materials are hugely abundant agricultural biomass, which their bioconversion occurs by various microorganisms. Environmental conditions greatly affect the biological processes and the diversity of living organisms. The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi and clearlying thier diversity and efficiency in salt affected soils and compost. Soil samples were collected from saline soils and municipal solid waste (MSW) compost. Cellulolytic fungi were isolated, then purified to single isolate. The isolates were identified morphologically. Cellulase, xylanase, glucanase, and mannanase were determined in plate assays using AZCL-substrates, while CMCase and FPase were evaluated by DNS method. Sixteen fungal isolates were directly isolated. The morphological identification of isolated fungi revealed Aspergillums and Penicillium genera were the dominant genera in saline environments. All the selected isolates exhibited cellulase and xylanase activity regardless their origin of isolation. Whereas some of Aspergillus isolated revealed ß-Glucanase activity, 56 % of isolates the produced mannanase. The mannanase activities among Aspergillus sp. isolates were based on isolate as the production depended on the isolated itself irrespective to the species but may be related to isolation source. All isolated fungi have been confirmed to produce CMCase and FPase. The highest CMCase and FPase activity was displayed by A. glaucus, SS6 and Com3 isolated from Sinai saline soil in Gilbana and MSW compost, respectively. Some isolates showed high efficiency for bioconversion of lignocellulosic material, according their enzymatic system, and could mitigate salt and alkalinity stress which suggesting an importance in biotechnological applications

Keywords: cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi; Saline soils; MSW; enzyme assay

Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass contains 40–50% cellulose, 25– 30% hemicellulose and 15–20% lignin [1]. The cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin are the backbone of agricultural biomass materials, which its percentage in organic wastes differ depending on the source [2]. The most abundant biomass is cellulose, which represents approximately 180 billion tons of the annual biomass produced through photosynthesis [3]. Furthermore, hemicelluloses, which comprise of a heterogeneous group of polysaccharides that contains xylans, β-glucans, and mannans, are also main components of plant cell walls [4].

Due to their large quantity, the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass is indispensable for the carbon cycle and being achieved through several time-consuming processes, which include mechanical, chemical, thermal, and biological treatments [5, 6]. The bioconversion of and hemicellulolytic fungi and clearlying thier diversity and efficiency isolates the produced mannanase. The mannanase activities among lignocellulosic materials occurs by the action of various microbial consortiums which yield a series of enzymes that work together to accomplish the bioconversion process [7]. The produced enzymes comprise of cellulases, hemicellulases, and pectinases, etc. which function synergistically to breakdown complex molecules in plant cell-wall [8].

Cellulolytic microorganisms are the major players in the deterioration process converting and hydrolyzing lignocellulosic biomass, through saccharification, to form simple sugar monomers to be fermented into bioethanol for the second generation biofuel production [9, 10]. Among these microbial groups, Fungi are the major cellulase-producing microorganisms, although a few species of bacteria and actinomycetes have also been described to produce cellulolytic enzymes [11, 12].

The degradability of fungal cellulosic enzymes toward cellulosic materials is very common, including that

Table 1. Some characterization of soil and compost sample Some characteristics of isolation sources Cellulose-
Table 1. Some characterization of soil and compost sample Some characteristics of isolation sources Cellulose-

produced by species of Trichoderma, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Phanerochaete, Humicola, Fusarium andMelanocarpus as reported by Sukumaran et al. [11].

The cellulases and xylanases are the major enzymes utilized for the biodegradation of lignocellulosic materials, particularly agricultural and forestry residues and wastes for producing valuable products such as ethanol fuel and other chemicals [13]. Whereas xylans, β- glucans, and mannans are the most important constituents of hemicelluloses in plant cell walls [4], xylanase, β- glucanase, and galactomannanase is considered with a grate importance for the bioconversion of hemicellulose content of organic biomass. Accordingly, determination of cellulase, xylanase, β-glucanase, and mannanase activities of specific microorganism could indicate its cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic degradative potential.

Various plate screening techniques have been described to identify polysaccharide-degrading microorganisms [14], which are mainly based on either the formation of complexes between polysaccharides and dyes [15, 16].

Recently, commercially available insoluble azurine crosslinked (AZCL) substrates as chromogenic substrates were utilized as substrates in various enzyme assays. By these AZCL substrates, a clear correlation between the diameters of the generated blue color zone and enzymes activity was proved [15].

Environmental conditions greatly affect their vital processes and the diversity of living organisms.

Microorganisms must possess adaptation mechanisms in order survive through stress in harsh environments including particular kinds of enzymes and resistance to extreme environmental parameters (pH, temperature, pressure and salinity) [17]. Recognition of microorganisms inhabiting such harsh ecosystems is essential for the biotechnological exploration of biodiversity [18, 19].

The current study was carried out to investigate the cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi inhibiting three different environments under stress conditions. Two soil ecosystems, from Kafrelsheikh and North Sinai Governorate, representing high salinity and alkalinity stress condition as well as municipal solid waste compost during its active stage to demonstrate high salinity and high temperature conditions. Exploration of the enzymatic system of isolated fungi toward biodegradation of lignocellulosic materials was among the aims of this study.

Experimental

Sampling

Samples were collected from three Egyptian’s harsh environments for fungal isolation. Two soil samples were collected, the first from Northern Sidi-Salim distract, Kafrelsheikh Governorate (31° 36' N, 30° 78' E) and the second from Glbanah area in Northern Sinai (30°56' N, 32°25' E). Both areas are salt affected soils as they are located few kilometers from the Mediterranean Sea. The third sample was collected from an active municipal solid waste (MSW) composting pile from Sidi-Salim MSW composting plant, Kafrelsheikh Governorate. The collected samples were characterized chemically and biologically (Table 1).

Isolation of fungi

Fungi were directly isolated from soils and compost using serial dilution plate technique. A 10 g of each sample was suspended in 90 mL of sterile distilled water and were shaken (150 rpm) for 30 min at room temperature. Then, ten-fold serial dilutions were prepared in sterilized distilled -5 water. One hundred microliters of the 10 dilution was -1 spreaded on Martin’s medium (glucose, 10 g L ; peptone, 5 -1 -1 -1 g L ; KH PO , 1 g L ; MgSO . 7H O, 0.5 g L ; Rose 2 4 4 2 -1 -1 Bengal, 0.033 g L ; and streptomycin, 0.03 g L ; pH 5.5- 6.0) and plates were then incubated at 30°C for 5-7 days. Colonies with different morphological shapes were selected and transferred several times on the same medium and further incubated at 30°C for 7 days to obtain pure cultures. All fungal isolates were maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants at 4°C and re-cultured on proper intervals. For morphological identification, the isolated fungi were grown aseptically on the PDA drop located on the surface of sterile glass microscope slides place in sterile petri dish. Fungal isolates were then identified conventionally according to their morphological features to determine their genera. The macroscopic (colour, texture, appearance, and diameter of colonies) and microscopic (microstructures) characteristics of isolates were observed for identification according to Barnett et al.[20], Barnett et al.[21], Domsch et al.[22], Lieckfeldt et al.[23].

Enzymes production and extraction

For enzyme production, all fungal isolates were inoculated -1 onto wheat bran agar (WBA) plates (wheat bran, 30 g L ; -1 -1 agar, 15 g L ; ZnSO . 7H O, 0.01 g L ; and CuSO . 5H O, 4 2 4 2 -1 0.005 g L ; pH 7.4; [5]. The inoculated plates were then incubated for 7 days at 25°C.

The produced enzyme complexes of the isolated fungi were extracted following the method described by Pedersen et al. [24]. In brief, twenty agar plugs (6 mm in diameter) with mycelia were excised from the plate of each isolate. The agar plugs were conveyed to a 14-mL vial, then 2.5 mL of distilled water was added, and the vial was then shaken at 150 rpm for 2 h at room temperature. The extracted solution was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 20 minutes to remove solids. The extracted enzyme solutions were kept at -20°C until used.

Enzyme plate assays

Four different AZCL substrates (AZCL-HE-cellulose, - arabinoxylan, -barley β-glucan, and –galactomannan (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland)) were used for cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzyme assays. The method described by Pedersen et al, [24] and Eida et al., [5] was followed for enzyme assay. The assay suspension containing agarose and each AZCL substrate was poured and allowed to solidify in Petri dishes, then 4 wells with a 4-mm diameter were made in the agarose plates, and 20 μL of enzyme extract was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C in the case of HE-cellulose and 12 h for all other substrates. Enzymatic activities were determined by measuring the diameter of the blue zone formed around each well.

CMCase activity

The method described by Mandels et al., [25] was followed to determine carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) activity. One ml of 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in 0.1 M citrate buffer pH 5.6 was placed in a test tube and 0.5 ml of extracted enzyme solution was added. The test tubes were ° ° incubated at 50 C in a water bath with shaking for 30 C min. The reaction was stopped by adding 3.0 ml of 3.5– dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) reagent to the reaction mixture, and boiled for 5 minutes [26]. The absorbance of the appropriately diluted reaction mixture was read at 540 nm using a spectrophotometer. One unit of cellulase was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1μmol reducing sugars as glucose equivalent per min in the reaction mixture under the specified assay conditions. All enzyme assays were performed in triplicates.

Filter paper activity (FPase)

Filter paper assay (FPA) for total cellulase activity in the cultural filtrate was measured according to the method of Mandels et al. [25]. Aliquots of appropriately diluted extracted enzyme were added to Whatman No.1 filter paper strip (1 X 6 cm; ≈ 50 mg) immersed in 1 mL of 0.05 M sodium citrate buffer of pH 5.0. The reducing sugars released were estimated using dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) according to the method described by Miller [26], after ° incubation at 50 C. One unit of filter paper (FPU) activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 μ mole of reducing sugar from filter paper per mL per min.

Results and Discussion

Samples were collected from different harsh environments for isolation and characterization of cellulolytic fungi. The MSW compost was collected from active composting piles with high temperature (around 76°C). All samples showed high salinity and high pH levels. Table (1) shows the salinity and alkalinity as well as microbiological characteristics of examines ecosystems.

Isolation of cellulolytic fungi

Three slate affected environments (soils and compost) were explored for their cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi. MSW compost was expected to contain heat as well as salt tolerant microorganisms. From all investigated samples, sixteen fungal isolates were selected, purified and identified. Six isolates were obtained from MSW compost sample while 5 isolates were isolated from soil sample collected from Gilbana area North Sinai Governorate. The last 5 isolates were picked-up from salt affected soil in Said-Salim district, Kafrelsheikh Governorate.

The isolates were identified by morphological features such as color of the colony and growth patterns. Microscopic characteristics were examined under the microscope include spore formation and color. The obtained data of the morphological identification of isolated fungi revealed that members belonging to Aspergillums and Penicillium genera inhabited all isolation sources. Different species of both genera were dominant in compost samples (Table 2).

The Ascomycota is known to inhabit a wide diverse of environments. Le Goff et al. [27] reported the dominance of Thermomyces lanuginosus, Aspergillus, Penicillium during the active phase of composting process. The members of Aspergillus, Penicillium were among the isolated cellulolytic fungi from different types of compost [5]. Gautam et al. [28] isolated and evaluated the cellulolytic activity of different species of Aspergillus and Penicillium from municipal waste compost.

The dominance of these genera and species may owing to their tolerance capability to several abiotic stress including high temperature, pH and high salt concentrations. Several reports documented the tolerance ability of numerous species of Aspergillus and Penicillium to several stressing parameters including drought, temperature degrees, pH value, salinity and acidity degree as well as aluminum and iron concentrations [29-31]. Additionally, Srinivasan et al. [32] found that Aspergillus and Penicillium were the most dominant fungi in salt affected soils when studying the Phosphate dissolving microorganisms.

The compost isolated Aspergillums sp. was identified morphologically as A. niger (Com1), A. terreus (Com2 and Com5) and A. glaucus (Com3 and Com6), while the only Penicillium isolate (Com4) was identified to genus level (Table 2). In accordance with our results, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus terreus and several Penicillium sp. had been isolated and identified by Anastasi et al. [33]. They isolated several fungi and studied their qualitative and quantitative composition and diversity during thermophilically produced compost and a vermicompost. Similar results have been obtained from both soil samples. A. niger (SS1 and KFS2), A.terreus (SS5 and KFS5), A. glaucus (SS2 and SS6) and Penicillium sp. (SS3, KFS1 and KFS3) were isolated and identified from both salt affected soils while last Aspergillus isolate was identified to genus level (Table 2). Afza et al. [34] isolated and identified several Aspergillums species including Aspergillus ficcum, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus flavus var. columnaris, Aspergillus terreus var. aureus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Emericella nidulans, Emericella rugulosa and Apergillus terricola var.americana from Pakistani soils. The existence of Aspergillus glaucus in soil and compost may refer to its extremely halophilic performance of this fungus as described by Liang et al. [35].

Cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes activities

Cellulose and hemicellulose are most abundant of biological renewable resource for bioconversion process and utilizations. The maximization of cellulose and

Table 2. M orphological characterization of fungal isolates Isolate No Isolation source Morphological identification
Table 2. M orphological characterization of fungal isolates Isolate No Isolation source Morphological identification

hemicellulose added value can be done through improving their hydrolysis to glucose and other fermentable sugars which can be biologically converted to ethanol. The bioconversion of biomass materials is achieved by complex enzymatic processes, which required a consortium of microbial enzymes that differed according to constitutes of the raw materials. Cellulases, xylanase, ß-Glucanase and mannanase are major hydrolytic enzymes, produced by many microorganisms, capable of degradation of cellulose for production of variety of valuable products. Evaluation and comparing the activities of these enzymes could facilitated the characterization, selection and further applications of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic microorganisms.

Cellulase plate assay

All the selected fungal isolates exhibited cellulase activity regardless their origin of isolation. Figure (2) Shows an example for the plate assay results with different AZCL substrates. The highest cellulase activity, expressed as diameter of blue color zone on the plate assay (Figure 1 & 2), was revealed by Penicillium sp. isolate (KFS1) and Aspergillus terreus isolated (KFS5) which were isolated from salt affected soils in Northern Delta (Kaferelsheikh Governorate). While the following isolates were Com5 (terreus), SS1 (A. niger) and Com3 (A. glaucus). This results are accordance with former findings of Jahangeer et al. [36] and de Siqueira et al. [37], who stated cellulase production by Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp.

Figure 1. Cellulase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 1. Cellulase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 2. The Enzymes assay using Azurine cross linked substrates. The plate in the middle represent the control without enzyme while the plates to lift and to right represent the high and low enzyme activity, respectively.
Figure 2. The Enzymes assay using Azurine cross linked substrates. The plate in the middle represent the control without enzyme while the plates to lift and to right represent the high and low enzyme activity, respectively.

Xylanase plate assay

All obtained isolates showed xylanase activities toward degradation of AZCL-arabioxylan as a substrate (Figure 3). Com6 (A. glaucus) exhibited the highest xylanase activity followed by A. niger (Com1) among compost isolates. Additionally, A. niger isolate (SS1) and Penicillium sp. isolates were the highest xylanase activities isolated from Sinai soils. With regard the isolated fungi from Kafrelsheikh soils, Penicillium sp. were the most active toward xylenes degradation although A. terreus (KFS5) showed high xylanase activities. The xylanase activities recorded for some members of Aspergillus and Penicillium genera was reported by Chàvez et al. [38] and Gawande and Kamat

Figure 3. Xylanase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 3. Xylanase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.

ß-Glucanase plate assay

The ß-Glucanase activity, as one of imprtant enxymes for degradation of hemicellulose, showed a different trend compared to cellulase and xylanase activities. The activity was isolate dependent regardless the isolation source or the isolated genera (Figure 4). Some of Aspergillus isolated revealed ß-Glucanase activity while the other were (Com2) and (Com3) and (SS5) and (SS6) among compost and Sinai isolates, respectively, showed the highest activity. Moreover, A. niger (KFS2) and Aspergillus sp. (KFS4) isolated from kafrelsheikh soil were the only positive isolates. On the other hand, none of Penicillium isolates displayed ß-Glucanase activity. The production of ß- Glucanase by Aspergillus sp. was described by Eida et al. [5] although, in contrast to this result, they stated the production of ß-Glucanase by Penicillium sp. This difference may owing to the difference in isolated spieces. This result is in agreement with those of Pederson et al. [28], who revealed that enzymatic activities of isolates differed amongst species and also individual strains of the same species. Additionally, they found that the isolation source is one of the major factors affecting enzyme production in

Figure 4. ß-Glucanase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 4. ß-Glucanase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.

Mannanase plate assay

Only 56 % (nine out of the 16) of isolates the were able to produce mannanase activity (Figure 5). On the contrary to ß- Glucanase activity, Penicillium sp. isolates produced manganese except one isolate from Kafresheikh (KFS3). The mannanese activities among Aspergillus sp. isolates were based on isolate itself irrespective the species but it may be related to isolation source. For instance, A. terreus isolated from compost gave a positive activity while isolates from the two soils under investigation were mannanese negative. In general, there were no large difference among the all positive isolates.This results could be supported by those of Eida et al. [5, 6] and Pederson et al. [28] which explained the variations in enzymatic activities according to the isolated strain. These results clarify that the enzymatic

Figure 5. Mannanase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard
Figure 5. Mannanase activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard

Carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase)

All isolated fungi have been confirmed to produce CMCase as one of the cellulase enzyme complex (Figure 6). The highest CMCase activities (1.302 and 1.292 U/ml) were displayed by both A. glaucus (SS3 and Com3, respectively) isolated from Sinai saline soil in Gilbana area and from MSW compost, respectively, then the Aspergillus sp. isolated from Ksfriskeikh soil. Other isolates showed relatively high CMCase activity, higher than 1 U/l, including KFS4 (Aspergillus sp.; 1.186 U/ml), SS2 (A. glaucus; 1.068 U/ml) and SS1 (A. niger; 1.024 U/ml). Whereas the lowest activities (0.496 and 0.534 U/ml) were recorded for Com1 (A. niger) and Com4 (Penicillium sp.), respectively, however, there were no big difference between other isolates. Several reports confirmed the cellulolytic activities of Aspergillus species which are known to use a broad range of lignocellulosic substrates [40, 41]. Moreover, in accordance with our results, Gautam et al. [28] documented the production of CMCase by several fungal species including Aspergillus and Penicillium isolated from MSW compost as well as soils. Although all isolates showed CMCase activity, the recorded results was lower than found by other researches which could reach up to 15 U/ml for isolates belonging to genera of Aspergillus and Penicillium

Figure 6. Carboxymethylcellulas activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 6. Carboxymethylcellulas activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.

Filter paperase (FPase)

Filter paper enzyme assay is a famous parameter for evaluating extracellular cellulolytic activity of an organism. Figure 7 illustrates the FPase unites of the fungi isolated from different stressed ecosystems. Among the isolated fungi in the current study, A. glaucus (SS6) isolated from Sinai saline soil, which revealed very high CMCase activity, presented the highest FPase (0.856 UFPase/ml) as well. Whereas the KFS4 isolate which was identified as Aspergillus sp. displayed the highest FPase activities (0.726 U/ml) among Kafrelsheikh isolates, A. terreus isolate no. Com5 exhibited the maximum FPase activity (0.722 U/ml) amongst compost isolates with very low difference. All other isolated revealed close activity units except KFS5 isolate (A. terreus) which showed relatively low FPase activity (0.243 U/ml). The cellulolytic activities of Aspergillus species are well documented toward broad range of lignocellulosic substrates. The enzymatic activaties of the microbes generally expressed as CMCase and FPase [40, 41]. Moreover, in agreement with results of this study, Gautam et al. [28] reported the production of Fpase and CMCase by different fungal species including Aspergillus and Penicillium isolated from MSW compost as well as soils. Moretti et al.[43] reported the difference in FPase activity according to isolates types as well as isolation source for several fungal genera including Aspergillus and Penicillium. The FPase activities revealed by effective isolates obtained from this study were relatively high (0.726- 0.856 U/ml) compared to the FPase activities (less than 0.5 U/ml) of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Trichoderma isolated

Figure 7. Filter paperase enzyme activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.
Figure 7. Filter paperase enzyme activity of isolated fungi from different harsh environments. Error bars present standard deviation.

Conclusion

Although several known cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi have been isolated from a wide diverse of environments, the current work exhibited the dominancy of members of Aspergillus and Penicillium as the major cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic fungi in salt affected environments. In the present study, some isolates showed high efficiency for bioconversion of lignocellulosic material, according their enzymatic system, and could mitigate salt and alkalinity stress. The enzyme activities of isolated fungi were found to be strain dependent. A. glaucus (SS6 and Com3) and A. terreus (Com5) revealed high CMCase, FPase, with relatively high activities toward other enzyme assays suggesting their importance for biotechnological applications. Further studies need to be conducted to evaluate the characteristic of produced enzymes by selected isolates.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Center, Egypt through the project no. P100711.

References

References

  1. Wiselogel A, Tyson J, Johnsson D: Biomass feedstock resources and composition. In: Wyman CE, editor. Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization. Washington: Taylor & Francis 1996; 105–118.
  2. Pauly M, and Keegstra K: Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 2008; 54:559–568.
  3. Park EY, Naruse K and Kato T: Improvement of cellulase production in cultures of Acremonium cellulolyticus using pretreated waste milk pack with cellulase targeting for biorefinery. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102:6120–6127.
  4. Chen H, Li X.-L, and Ljungdahl LG: Sequencing of a 1,3-1,4-β -D- glucanase (lichenase) from the anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces strain PC- 2: Properties of the enzyme expressed in Escherichia coli and evidence that the gene has a bacterial origin. J. Bacteriol. 1997; 179:6028–6034.
  5. Eida, MF, Nagaoka T, Wasaki J, and Kouno K: Evaluation of Cellulolytic and Hemicellulolytic Abilities of Fungi Isolated from Coffee Residue and Sawdust Composts. Microbes Environ. 2011; 26(3):220-227.
  6. Eida, MF, Nagaoka T, Wasaki J, and Kouno K: Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose-decomposing Bacteria Inhabiting Sawdust and Coffee Residue Composts. Microbes Environ 2012; 27(3):226-233.
  7. Pérez J, Muñoz-Dorado J, de la Rubia T, and Martínez J: Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int. Microbiol. 2002; 5:53-63.
  8. Doi RH: Cellulases of mesophilic microorganisms: Cellulosome and noncellulosome producers. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2008; 1125:267–279.
  9. Martın C, Lopez Y, Plasencia Y, and Hern´andez E: Characterisation of agricultural and agro-industrial residues as raw materials for ethanol production. Chem. Biochem. Engineer. Quart. 2006; 20: 443–447.
  10. Sanchez OJ and Cardona CA: Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. 2008; 99: 5270–5295.
  11. Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, and Pandey A: Microbial cellulasesproduction, applications and challenges. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2005; 64:832-
  12. Wen Z, Liao W and Chen S: Production of cellulase/β -glucosidase by the mixed fungi culture Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus phoenicis on dairy manure. Process Biochem. 2005; 40:3087-3094.
  13. Ja’afaru MI: Screening of Fungi Isolated from Environmental Samples for Xylanase and Cellulase Production. ISRN Microbiol. 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/283423.
  14. Teather, RM and Wood PJ: Use of congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982; 43:777-780.
  15. Ten LN, Im WT, Kim MK, Kang MS, and Lee ST: Development of a plate technique for screening of polysaccharide-degrading microorganisms by using a mixture of insoluble chromogenic substrates. J. Microbiol. Methods 2004; 56:375-382.
  16. Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, and Mielenz JR: Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006; 24(5): 452-481.
  17. Clarke A: Evolution, adaptation and diversity: global ecology in an Antartic context. Antar Biol in a Glo Context 2003; 3–17.
  18. Nicolaus B, Kambourova M, Oner ET: Exopolysaccharides from extremophiles: from fundamentals to biotechnology. Environ Technol 2010; 31:1145–1158.
  19. Ferrer M, Golyshina O, Beloqui A, Golyshina PN: Mining enzymes from extreme environments. Curr Opin in Microbiol 2007; 10:207–214
  20. Barnett HL and Hunter B B: Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. Minneapolis: Burgess Pub. Co. 1972.
  21. Barnett HL and Hunter BB: Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. New York: Macmillan. 1987.
  22. Domsch KH, Gams W, and Anderson T-H: Compendium of Soil Fungi, vol. 1, Academic Press, London, UK. 1980.
  23. Lieckfeldt E, Samuels GJ, Nirenberg HI, and Petrini O: A morphological and molecular perspective of Trichoderma viride: is it one or two species? Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 1999; 65(6):2418–2428.
  24. Pedersen M, Hollensted M, Lange L, and Andersen B: Screening for cellulose and hemicellulose degrading enzymes from the fungal genus Ulocladium. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2009; 63:484-489.
  25. Mandels M, Andreotti RE, Roche C: Measurements of saccharifying cellulases. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1976; 6:21–23.
  26. Miller GL: Use of Dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry 1959; 31:426-248.
  27. Le Goff O, Bru-Adan V, Bacheley H, Godon JJ and Wery N: The microbial signature of aerosols produced during the thermophilic phase of composting. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010; 108:325–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2672.2009.04427.x.
  28. Gautam SP, Bundela PS, Pandey AK, Jamaluddin, Awasthi MK and Sarsaiya S: Diversity of Cellulolytic Microbes and the Biodegradation of Municipal Solid Waste by a Potential Strain. Int. J. Microbiol. 2012; Article ID 325907, 12 pages doi:10.1155/2012/325907.
  29. Srividya S, Soumya S and Pooja K: Influence of environmental factors and salinity on phosphate solubilisation by a newly isolated Aspergillus niger F7 from agricultural soil. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009; 8(9):1864-1870.
  30. Xiao C, Chi R, Li X, Xia M and Xia Z: Biosolubilization of rock phosphate by three stress-tolerant fungal strains. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2011; 165:719–727.
  31. Yvas P, Rahi P, Chauhan A and Gulati A: Phosphate solubilisation potential and stress tolerance of Eupenicillium parvum from tea soil. Mycol Res 2007; 111:931–938.
  32. Srinivasan R, Yandigeri MS, Kashyap S and Alagawadi AR: Effect of salt on survival and P-solubilization potential of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from salt affected soils. Saudi J Biol Sci 2012; 19: 427–
  33. Anastasi A, Varese GC and Filipello Marchisio V: Isolation and identification of fungal communities in compost and vermicompost. Mycologia 2005; 97:33–44.
  34. 34. Afza H, Shazad S and Nisa SQU: Morphological identification of aspergillus species from the soil of larkana district (sindh , pakistan ). Asian J Agri Biol. 2013; 1(3):105-117.
  35. Liang X, Liu Y, Xie L, Liu X, Wei Y, Zhou X and Zhang SH: A ribosomal protein AgRPS3aE from halophilic Aspergillus glaucus confers salt tolerance in heterologous organisms. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:3058– 3070. 10.3390/ijms16023058.
  36. Jahangeer S, Khan N, Jahangeer S, Sohail M, Shahzad S, Ahmad A, and Khan SA: Screening and characterization of fungal cellulases isolated from the native environmental source. Pak. J. Bot. 2005; 37:739-748.
  37. de Siqueira FG, de Siqueira EG, Jaramillo PMD, Silveira MHL, Andreaus J, Couto FA, Batista LR, and Filho EXF: The potential of agro-industrial residues for production of holocellulase from filamentous fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2010; 64:20-26.
  38. Chàvez R, Bull P, and Eyzaguirre J: The xylanolytic enzyme system from the genus Penicillium. J. Biotechnol. 2006; 123:413-433.
  39. Gawande P, and Kamat MY: Production of xylanases by immobilized Aspergillus sp. using lignocellulosic waste. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000; 16:111-112.
  40. Wang XJ, Bai JG and Lian YX: Optimization of multienzyme production by two mixed strains in solid-state fermentation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006; 73:533–540.
  41. Gao J, Weng H, Zhu D, Yuan M, Guan F and Xi Y: Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from the thermoacidophilic fungus Aspergillus terreus M11 under solid-state cultivation of corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2008; 99:7623–7629.
  42. Damaso MCT, Terzi SC, Farias AX, de Oliveira ACP, Fraga ME and Couri S: Selection of cellulolytic fungi isolated from diverse substrates. Braz. arch. biol. technol. 2012; 55(4):513-520.
  43. Moretti MMS, Bocchini-Martins DA, Da Silva R, Rodrigues A, Sette LD and Gomes E: Selection of Thermophilic and Thermotolerant Fungi for the Production of Cellulases and Xylanases under Solid-State Fermentation. Braz. J. Microbiol 2012; 1062-1071.