Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 8, Issue 3, 2021, pp. 17-23

Development and physicochemical evaluation of bilayered transdermal patches of Ondansetron hydrochloride

Anuja S. Motule1, Minakshee G. Nimbalwar1, Wrushali A. Panchale1, Jagdish V. Manwar2, Ravindra L. Bakal1, Bhushan R. Gudalwar2

1IBSS’s Dr. Rajendra Gode Institute of Pharmacy, Mardi Road, Amravati-444 602, MS, India
2IBSS’s Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, Mardi Road, Amravati-444 602, MS, India
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2021.v8.i03.pp17-23 | Published: 2021-07-01 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Bilayered transdermal patches for delivery of ondansetron hydrochloride were developed by-using polymers HPMC E15 (2.5 gm) and Eudragit RLPO (0.35gm) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Different formulations were prepared by varying the grades of polymers by solvent casting method. Prepared patches were evaluated for physicochemical characteristics, mechanical properties, ex vivo permeation study, etc. Optimum formulation consisted of drug (0.395gm), HPMC E15 (2.5gm), PEG 400 (0.75 mL) and oleic acid (0.25 mL) in primary layer and Eudragit RLPO (0.35gm) and PEG 400 (0.105 mL) in secondary layer. The optimized formulation containing showed 109.1 μg /hr/cm2 linear diffusion of drug, 6.33 kg/mm2 tensile strength and 120.33 folding endurance. Drug and polymers interactions were investigated by FTIR studies. FTIR of ondansetron has shown intense band at 3486.61 cm-1, 2922.38cm-1, and 1651.99 cm-1 corresponding to presence of functional groups such as NH group, C-C-Aromatic group and C-C-Aliphatic group. FT-IR of optimized batch had intense bands at 3498.22 cm-1, 2929.13 cm-1, and 1635.88 cm-1 which indicate no change in the functional groups such as NH group, C-C-Aromatic group, C-C-Aliphatic and confirmed undisturbed structure of ondansetron, which indicate no drug-excipients interaction. Thus, Ondansetron hydrochloride can be effectively formulated as bilayered transdermal patch, and it is possible to achieve adequate physicochemical parameters and desired drug diffusion profile with the optimum combination of polymers

Keywords: Bilayered transdermal patches; Ex-vivo permeation; Ondansetron hydrochloride.

Introduction

Transdermal patches generally refer to topical application delivers to healthy intact skin either for localized or for systemic therapy. Transdermal patch has many advantages over the conventional therapy or controlled release oral systems. Transdermal patch imparts constant blood levels, avoids first pass metabolism, increased patient compliance, and avoids dose dumping. The application of transdermal delivery to access of drugs is limited due to the significant barrier to penetration across the skin which is allied optimized formulation containing showed 109.1 μg /hr/cm linear , 2922.38cm , and 1651.99 cm corresponding to presence of primarily with the outermost stratum corneum layer of the epidermis [1-3].

Ondansetron hydrochloride (OND HCl) is a serotonin (5HT- 3) receptor inhibitor, widely used in prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with moderately-emetogenic cancer chemotherapy, radiation therapy and for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting [4-6]. After oral administration, drug is rapidly absorbed but undergoes extensive first pass metabolism which leads to poor bioavailability of 60%. Hence, OND HCl was considered to be a suitable candidate for transdermal delivery system [7].

Table 1. Composition of batches. Primary Layer Secondary Layer Drug* HPMC * PEG 400 Oleic acid E- RLPO * PEG 400 F1 0.395 2.00 0.600 0.200 0.30 0.090
Table 1. Composition of batches. Primary Layer Secondary Layer Drug* HPMC * PEG 400 Oleic acid E- RLPO * PEG 400 F1 0.395 2.00 0.600 0.200 0.30 0.090

suspension, mucoadhesive tablets, nasal delivery system, etc available for various drugs [8-16]. In reported work, single layered matrix patches of OND HCl were prepared that may have non linear diffusion pattern [17]. By taking the account of advantages of bi-layer matrix patches over single layer matrix patches, attempts were made to develop bilayered transdermal patches for delivery of same drug.

Materials and methods

Materials

Pure drug OND HCl was obtained as a gift sample from Alpha Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai. Polymers and Polyethylene glycol 400 and Oleic acid were obtained as gift sample from Concept Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.

Aurangabad. All other ingredients were use of analytical grade.

Method

Drug loaded matrix-type transdermal patches of OND HCl were prepared by using solvent casting method. HPMC E15 (0.35gm) (Viscosity 15cP) and Eudragit RLPO (2.5gm) (Viscosity 15cP) in the concentration used as primary and secondary layer polymers, respectively, and polyethylene glycol 400 as plasticizer [18]. HPMC E15 was added to 25 ml of the solvent mixture (dichloromethane and methanol, 1:1 v/v) and allowed to stand for 6 hrs to swell. About 0.395 gm of drug was dissolved in 10 ml of solvent mixture and added to the polymeric solution. Measured quantity of oleic acid (10%v/w) was added as penetration enhancer and 30% v/w of PEG 400 added as a plasticizer. This was set aside for 2 hrs to remove entrapped air, then transferred into a petri plate of diameter 9 cm and dried at room temperature. The secondary polymeric solution was prepared by dissolving weighed Eudragit RLPO and 30% v/w of PEG 400 in 15 ml of solvent mixture and poured on the primary polymer layer and allow to dry at room temperature.

Batch a, # The developed patches were removed carefully, cut to size 2 2.2×2.2 cm (each having an area of 4.84 cm contain 30mg of OND HCl), and stored during a desiccators. The batches composition is shown in Table 1.

Evaluation of physicochemical properties

Physicochemical and ex-vivo drug release study of prepared batches were undertaken [19-22]. The studied parameters are discussed below.

Thickness

Patch thickness was measured using digital micrometer screw gauge at three different places, and therefore the average value was calculated.

Folding endurance

The folding endurance of patches was measured manually. A strip of patch (2.2 x 2.2cm) was cut and repeatedly folded at the identical place till it broke. The patch may well be folded in number of sometime at the identical place without breaking/cracking gave the worth of folding endurance.

Weight uniformity

Randomly selected patches were weighed individually and average weight was calculated.

Moisture absorption

The patches were weighed accurately and placed in a desiccator containing 100 ml of saturated solution of aluminium chloride (60% and 84 % RH). The films were taken out and weighed after 3days. The percentage of moisture uptake was calculated as the difference between the final and initial weight with reference to the initial weight.

Final weight - Initial weight % Moisture absorption = x 100 Initial weight # b, #

Percentage moisture loss

Percentage moisture loss was applied to test the (physical stability) moisture sensitiveness during storage of patch. The films were weighed accurately and kept in an exceedingly desiccators containing anhydrous salt. The films were taken out and weighed after 3 days [21]. The moisture loss was calculated using the formula.

Initial weight - Final weight % Moisture loss = x 100 Final weight

Water vapour transmission rate

Glass vials of 5 ml capacity were washed thoroughly and dried to a relentless weight in an oven. About 1 gm of fused salt was taken within the vials and thus the polymer films of 4.84 cm2 were fixed over the brim with the assistance of a tape. Then the vials were weighed and stored in a very humidity chamber of 80-90% relative humidity condition for a period until it show constant weight gain (7 days). The vials were removed and weighed at 24hr time intervals to notice down the weight gain.

Final weight - Initial weight Water vapour transmission rate = x 100 Area x Time

Flatness of patches

Longitudinal strips were cut from the prepared patch and therefore the lengths of each strips was measured. Variation within the length because of the non-uniformity in flatness was measured. Flatness was calculated by measuring constriction of strips and a zero percent constriction was considered to be adequate 100% flatness.

L - L 1 2 %Constriction = x 100 L2 Where, L - Initial length; L - Final length 1 2

Tensile strength

The tensile strength of the patch was determined by using the tensiometer. It consists of two load cell grips in which lower cell was fixed and upper one was movable. Film strips with dimensions of 2*2 cm were mounted between these cell grips, and force was bit by bit applied until the film broke. The tensile strength was taken directly from the dial reading in kg unit.

Applied force m x g Tensile stress (S) = = Cross section area b x t Where, m - Mass in kg; g- Acceleration due to gravity; b- Breath of specimen in mm; t - Thickness of specimen in mm.

Determination of drug content

2 The patch with size 2.2 x 2.2 cm was cut and dissolved in distilled water, methanol and dichloromethane were added to dissolve the patch and volume was made up 100 ml diluted to 10ml. The absorbance of the solution The absorbance of the solution was measured using UV-visible spectrophotometer (Simadzu model UV 2401 PC, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) with spectral width of 2nm, quartz cell (1.0 cm path) at 249 nm and concentration was calculated. By correcting dilution factor, the drug content was calculated.

Ex-vivo drug permeation study

Preparation of skin

A thickness of skin was excised from dorsal site of dead rat and skin was washed with water. The fatty tissue layer was removed by using nails of fingers. The outer portion with hair were applied with depilatory and allowed to dry. With the help of wet cotton the hairs were scrubbed and washed with normal isotonic solution. The skin was kept in normal isotonic solution in refrigerator until skin was used for drug permeation study. Before use, the skin was allowed to equilibrate with room temperature. Then skin were mount between donor and receptor compartment of cell. The skin was clamped in such a way that the dermal side are getting to be in touch with receptor medium.

Diffusion study

In-vitro permeation of drug from transdermal patch through dialysis membrane (Hi–Media) with molecular weight cut off of 12000 was studied. The membrane was mounted over a Franz diffusion cell and then placed the transdermal patch. The receiver compartment of the diffusion cell was filled with 15ml of phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and the setup was placed over a magnetic stirrer at 37°C with the help of hot plate. Samples of 3ml were withdrawn and replenished immediately from the receiver compartment at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12h. They were stored in refrigerated condition till the analysis was performed. The content of drug in the samples was analyzed by UV–Visible spectrophotometer 249 nm.

Drug-polymer interaction studies

FTIR spectroscopy was used to study the physical and chemical interaction between drug and excipients. FTIR spectrum of OND HCl, HPMC E15 and Eudragit RLPO and a physical mixture of OND HCl: HPMC E15 and Eudragit RLPO was recorded using KBr mixing method on FTIR (FTIR-1700, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

Accelerated stability study

The accelerated stability studies were applied on optimized formulation i.e. F6. The formulation was stored at 40 ± 2°C/75 ± 5 % RH for 3 months. After 3 months, samples were withdrawn and retested for drug content, enduringness and ex-vivo permeation study.

Result and discussion

Here, we have prepared bilayered transdermal patches of

Table 3. Results of water vapor transmission rate, folding endurance, flatness, tensile strength and % drug content.
Table 3. Results of water vapor transmission rate, folding endurance, flatness, tensile strength and % drug content.

diffusing from the surface of the patches and it act as diffusion controlling membrane. Various batches of bilayered transdermal patches of OND HCl were prepared using HPMC E15 and Eudragit RLPO polymers (see Table 1). All nine batches were evaluated for physicochemical properties. Thickness of all batches were ranged from 500 to 636 μm and folding endurance of all bathes were ranged from 110 to 132. Weight variation amongst different batches were lies in between 252 to 345mg/patch. Percent moisture absorption study was undertaken to check the integrity of patches at extreme humidity condition.

The % moisture absorption was determined at relative humidity (RH) of 60% and 84% level. The % moisture absorption in the formulations was found to be increased by increase in the concentration of HPMC E15 due to its hydrophilic property and also with decreasing the grade of Eudragit RLPO polymer. The moisture absorption in the patches ranged from 3.55 to 5.72%.

The % moisture loss was determined to check the moisture holding capacity which relates the stability of formulation.

The range of % moisture loss was found to be 2.26 to 3%.

The results are depicted in Table 2.

Table 2. Results of thickness, weight variation, % moisture absorption and % moisture loss .
Table 2. Results of thickness, weight variation, % moisture absorption and % moisture loss .

Water vapour transmission rate was checked in order to get information about optimal moisture at skin. All the prepared patches were 100% flat and uniform. Tensile strength and % drug content in all batches were also measured. With increase in concentration of HPMC E15 and Eudragit RLPO results in increase in tensile strength. Folding endurance of patches was found to be satisfactory. The results ranges from 1.82 to 2.42 (water vapour transmission rate), 110.66 to 132.66 (folding endurance), 5.33 to 7.26 (tensile strength, 2 Kg/mm ) and 93.78 to 96.13 (% drug content) (Table 3). Ex- vivo permeation study was undertaken for all batches. Batch F6 showed linear diffusion of drug at rate of 109.1 μg 2 /hr/cm . Eudragit layer minimizes the permeation of the drug molecules from the patches. In addition, Eudragit layer could control the release of the drug from the patches. This was evidenced from the release studies of the monolayer patches where the drug release was rapid. Therefore a rate controlling membrane can control the drug release from patches. The batch F6 showed required flux with zero order release kinetics was selected as the optimized formulation (Figure 1).

Figure 2. FTIR spectra of optimized formulation (Batch F6).
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of optimized formulation (Batch F6).
Figure 1. Comparative in- vitro drug diffusion profiles from experimental batches using phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 7.4) as a dissolution medium.
Figure 1. Comparative in- vitro drug diffusion profiles from experimental batches using phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 7.4) as a dissolution medium.
Figure 3. Accelerated stability study of optimized batch (F6).
Figure 3. Accelerated stability study of optimized batch (F6).
Table 4. Accelerated stability study of optimized batch (F6).
Table 4. Accelerated stability study of optimized batch (F6).

In this work, we successfully designed a bilayered patch based on a combination of a HPMC E15 and Eudragit RLPO polymer for the transdermal delivery of ondansetron hydrochloride. Batch F6 showed the potential to retard the drug release and possessed significant tensile strength. Patches were found stable with respect to evaluation of physicochemical properties as per ICH guidelines. Finally, it could conclude that Ondansetron hydrochloride can be effectively formulated as bilayered transdermal patches, and it is possible to achieve adequate physicochemical parameters and desired drug diffusion profile with the optimum combination of polymers.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

All the authors have contributed equally in designing, drafting the manuscript as per the journal submission format. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

References

  1. Pastore MN, Kalia YN, Horstmann M, Roberts MS. Transdermal patches: history, development and pharmacology. Br J Pharmacol. 2015; 172(9): 2179-2209.
  2. Alexander SPH, Benson HE, Faccenda E, Pawson AJ, Sharman JL, McGrath JC, et al. The Concise guide to pharmacology 2013/14: Overview. Br J Pharmacol. 2013; 170:1449–1458.
  3. Krishna KD, Pradip ST, Navin SR. Preparation and Optimization of Fast Dissolving Film of Naratriptan Hydrochloride. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2017; 11(2): 124-131.
  4. Can AS, Erdal MS, Gungor S, Ozsoy Y. Optimization and characterization of chitosan films for transdermal delivery of ondansetron. Molecules. 2013; 18(5):5455-5471.
  5. Carlisle J, Stevenson CA. WITHDRAWN: Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 7(7):CD004125.
  6. Malik RK, Malik P, Gulati N, Nagaich U. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive ondansetron hydrochloride beads for the management of emesis in chemotherapy. Int J Pharm Investig. 2013; 3(1):42-46. doi:10.4103/2230- 973X.108962.
  7. Huddart R, Altman RB, Klein TE. PharmGKB summary: Ondansetron and tropisetron pathways, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2019; 29(4):91-97.
  8. Vaidya VM, Manwar JV, Mahajan NM, Sakarkar DM. Design and invitro evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of terbutaline sulphate. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2009; 1(3): 588-
  9. Dhamankar AK, Manwar JV, Kumbhar DD. The Novel Formulation Design of O/of Ketoprofen for Improving Transdermal Absorption. Int J of Pharm Tech Res. 2009; 4(1Suppl): 1449-1457.
  10. Manwar J, Kumbhar DD, Bakal RL, Baviskar S, Manmode R. Response surface based co-optimization of release kinetics and mucoadhesive strength for an oral mucoadhesive tablet of cefixime trihydrate. Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University. 2016; 54: 227–235.
  11. Manwar JV, Patil SS, Patil B, Jadhao RG, Kumbhar DD, Bakal R. Diclofenac Sodium Loaded Nanosized Ethosomes: An Investigation on Z-Average, Polydispersity and Stability. J Pharm Res. 2017; 1(3): 000115.
  12. Patil SS, Kumbhar DD, Manwar JV, Jadhao RG, Bakal RL, Wakode S. Ultrasound-Assisted Facile Synthesis of Nanostructured Hybrid Vesicle for the Nasal Delivery of Indomethacin: Response Surface Optimization, Microstructure, and Stability. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2019; 20(3):97.
  13. Nimbalwar MG, Upadhye K, Dixit G. Fabrication and evaluation of ritonavir proniosomal transdermal gel as a vesicular drug delivery system. Pharmacophore. 2016; 7(2): 82-95.
  14. Manmode R, Manwar J, Vohra M, Padgilwar S, Bhajipale N. Effect of preparation method on antioxidant activity of ayurvedic formulation kumaryasava. J Homeop Ayurv Med. 2012; 1:114. doi:10.4172/2167-1206.1000114.
  15. Suroshe RS, Wakade RB, Panchale WA, Sakhare AD, Rathod RR, Pophalkar PB. Development and Characterization of Osmotic Drug Delivery System of Model Drug. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2018; 7(18): 1158-1171.
  16. Kadam CY, Bobade NN, Pophalkar PB, Hole SU, Suroshe RS, Panchale WA. Design and In vitro Characterization of Phase Transition System using Rivastigmine Tartrate for Nasal Drug Delivery System. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2018; 8(1): 815-829.
  17. Cho, JR, Van Duong, A, Nguyen, LTT. et al. Design of transdermal matrix patch containing ondansetron. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 2016; 46: 677–684.
  18. Mohd F, Bontha LS, Bontha VK, Vemula SK. Formulation and Evaluation of Transdermal Films of Ondansetron Hydrochloride. MOJ Bioequiv Availab. 2017. 3(4): 00039.
  19. Puri A, Bhattaccharjee SA, Zhang W, et al. Development of a Transdermal Delivery System for Tenofovir Alafenamide, a Prodrug of Tenofovir with Potent Antiviral Activity Against HIV and HBV. Pharmaceutics. 2019; 11(4):173.
  20. Mikolaszek B, Kazlauske J, Larsson A, Sznitowska M. Controlled drug release by the pore structure in polydimethylsiloxane transdermal patches. Polymers (Basel). 2020; 12(7):1520.
  21. Pastore MN, Kalia YN, Horstmann M, Roberts MS. Transdermal patches: history, development and pharmacology. Br J Pharmacol. 2015; 172(9): 2179-209.
  22. Furuishi T, et al., Formulation design and evaluation of a transdermal drug delivery system containing a novel eptazocine salt with the Eudragit® E adhesive. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2019; 54: 101289.