Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 6, Issue 2, 2019, pp. 06-09

Significance of inflammatory biomarkers in assessment of weight reduction in obese children with Down syndrome

Mohamed E. Elhadidy1, Ayman Kilany1, Hend Rashad2, Fateheya M. Metwally2, Adel Hashish1, Ahmed Mashaal1, Ehab Abdelraouf1

1Department of Research on Children with Special Needs, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
2Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2019.v6.i02.pp06-09 | Published: 2019-04-05 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Objectives: The present study is designed to evaluate the effect of diet alone or in combination with physical therapy in obese children with Down syndrome. Material and Methods: 60 obese children (30 males+30 females) with Down syndrome (DS) before diet and therapy was subjected to clinical examination. They were divided into three groups matched in age and sex, group I (control), included 20 of them. The other 40 were divided into 2 groups, group IIA and group IIB, each of them 20. Group IIA was subjected to diet intervention program only while group IIB was subjected to both diet and physical therapy programs. Blood samples were obtained from all groups before and after therapy. Plasma levels of leptin, IL-1 and IL-6 were determined. Results: The study found significant weight reduction in both groups favoring combined diet and physical activity. Diet lowered but not significantly the plasma levels of leptin hormone, IL-1 and IL-6. While the diet and physical therapy in combination reduced significantly the plasma levels of leptin, IL-1 and IL-6. Conclusions: The combination of physical activity with nutritional intervention is an effective method for weight reduction in obese children with DS. One of the most objective parameter for the benefit of weight reduction is the inflammatory biomarkers, leptin, IL-1, and IL-6 in the early school age (6-9 years).

Keywords: Secondary obesity; diet intervention; physical therapy; Down syndrome; inflammatory biomarkers

Introduction

In several developing and developed countries, the obesity prevalence has been steadily increasing over the past few decades. Obesity is a complex physiologic state associated with multiple molecular changes [1].

Mental health consequences of obese childhood were examined by little research relatively, although the physical health consequences of them are well described. While rates of prevalence continue to rise, and the childhood overweight has become pandemic [2], much less examined these consequences in obese children with DS. While obesity is the fifth leading risk factor for global deaths, it is of special concern for those with disabilities. According to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 16% of children without disabilities compared to 22.5% of children with disabilities are obese [3].

Researches, also, indicates that obesity is related directly to cognitive abilities including reception, processing of environmental information and behavior. The main cognitive domains affected by obesity include executive functions, memory, and processing speed [4]. Reduced achievement and mathematics are related to overweight in childhood [5]. Also, overweight in adolescents have deficits in cognitive functions and attention [6].

Troubles in swallowing or chewing can lead the children with Down syndrome (DS) to eat more processed and softer foods. In addition, children with DS suffer from deficits in sensory that make coordination and balance more difficult, leading to decreased physical activity. When the parents attempt to push the children with DS to healthy foods or exercise, the children have a tendency to be noncompliant or oppositional and may also have poor impulse control [7]. In humans, 1 of 800-1000 births suffers from DS, which is the most common chromosomal abnormality. Chromosome 21 triplication causes DS, which is an autosomal disorder [8].

Children with DS show strengths in social functioning and they may use relative strengths in social skills to compensate for other weaknesses of other adaptive domains. Individuals with DS may also show relative competence in forming relationships with others [9]. In the body, most cells produce small proteins are called cytokines, which promote cell-cell interaction through multiple biological activities. Many biological processes inflammatory and immune responses [10]. In DS, the cytokine role is still unclear, despite a growing interest in the immune system contribution [11].

Smigielska-Kuzia, et al. found significantly differences in mean serum IL-1α and IL-6 concentrations between the DS group and controls [11]. In adults with DS, no changes in plasma levels of IL-6 [12]. Adipocytes secrete a leptin hormone that plays an important role in the food intake regulation by promoting energy and stimulating satiety via energy expenditure. Typically, increased levels of the hormone correlate with obesity, due to leptin resistance. Studies suggest that pre-pubertal overweight DS children have high levels of leptin, which correlates with increased body mass index and degree of adiposity [13].

In obesity, circulating levels of leptin increase proportionally to total adipose tissue, has been characterized as a key member of the molecular network [1]. Exercise is extremely important in reducing body weight as it provides a decrease in body fat. Therefore children with DS should be encouraged to practice physical exercises to promote the development of lean mass and help in caloric expenditure [14].

The aim of this study was to determine the reduction in BMI after the diet intervention alone or when combined with physical therapy in obese children with Down syndrome, and also the significance of inflammatory biomarkers in assessment of weight reduction.

Materials & methods

Participants and materials

The study included 60 obese children (30 males+30 females) with DS. They were recruited from outpatient clinic, Center of Clinical Research Excellence, National Research Center, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University. The inclusion criteria were meeting the diagnostic according to the criteria of DSM-5 for DS, with age range from 6 to 9 years according to eligibility 2 criteria, while their BMI will be not less than 34.9 kg/m or (95%) on BMI percentile obesity class I [15]. Parents or care givers of all participants already signed informed legal consents. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Standard Weight-Height scale: (Seca apparatus “SMIG”) is a metal device was used to measure weight and height for all children before and after diet and physical therapy [16]. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as BMI= kg/ 2 m (Whole body vibration device and balance board) as vestibular system stimulators, (electric treadmill and stepper exercise) as weight bearing exercise were used for physical treatment. A diet intervention program was applied according to [17].

Methods

The DS group before diet and therapy was subjected to clinical examination after reporting a full medical history. They were divided into three groups matched in age and sex, group I (control), included 20 of them. The other 40 were divided into 2 groups, group IIA and group IIB, each of them 20. Venous blood samples were collected (from all participants before diet intervention and physical therapy) into 5-ml vacutainer tubes containing potassium EDTA and mixed by gentle inversion. Each sample was centrifuged and processed within thirty minutes from sample collection to separate plasma, these plasma samples were kept at -20ºC until using. Group IIA was subjected to diet intervention program only, nutritional requirements were measured according to the method which is commonly used to estimate energy requirements for children is based on age: basal daily needs for all children= 100 kcal; added to the basal needs 125 kcal x age in years for boys and 100 kcal x age in years for girls. Add up to 20% more kcal for very active children. Children daily eating patterns generally include 3 meals and 2 or 3 snacks, depending on length of time between meals, age of child and level of physical activity [17]. While group IIB was subjected to both diet and physical therapy programs, aiming at significant weight reduction for both groups. Whole body vibration exercise was administered for 3 series lasting for 3 minutes, followed by 3-min pause between each series [18]. Each level was controlled by the patient before starting the next level of balance board exercise, exercise was repeated five times per session each time lasted one minute [19]. Treadmill exercise was applied three times weekly for a total period of treatment for 12 weeks and 30 minutes for every session [20]. 30 minutes (20 minutes each with a 10 minutes rest in-between) for each patient in stepper exercise [21]. After the end of diet intervention and physical therapy, another venous blood samples from group IIA and group IIB were obtained into 5-ml vacutainer tubes containing potassium EDTA for plasma isolation. Plasma leptin measuring was performed according to the method described by [22, 23]. The IL-1 and IL-6 measuring was determined using ELISA kits (Nova, China). All tests were performed for each case before and after 12 weeks of diet intervention and physical rehabilitation program.

.

Statistical analysis

All the values were presented as means ± standard error of the means (SE). Comparisons between different groups were carried out using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey´s HSD test for multiple comparisons. Difference was considered ® significant when p <0.0001. Graph Pad prism software (version 5) was used to carry out these statistical tests.

Table 1. Comparison between control, diet intervention alone and diet intervention in combination with physical therapy on body mass index (BMI), plasma leptin level, interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in obese children with Down syndrome.
Table 1. Comparison between control, diet intervention alone and diet intervention in combination with physical therapy on body mass index (BMI), plasma leptin level, interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in obese children with Down syndrome.

Data were expressed as mean ± SE (n = 20). Statistical analysis was carried out by onesignificantly different from control at p<0.0001.

Results

The study found significant weight reduction in both groups favoring combined diet and physical activity. We can conclude the combination of physical activity with nutritional intervention is an effective method for weight reduction in obese children with DS. BMI was significantly reduced after the combination between diet and physical therapy (Table 1).

for multiple comparisons. a

Discussion

When they are born, children with DS have anatomical and structural differences that make them susceptible to potential food problems. Some of these differences are:

reduced production of saliva, macroglossia, small oral cavity, poor coordination for sucking and swallowing, among others. It is also very common to present periodontal disease and consequent loss of dentition. In this sense, the first intervention at nutritional level should be the detailed research of the main difficulties that the DS patients present in their diet, adapting the diet, if necessary [24].

Also, Wong et al. suggested that population with DS need help to keep their weights at healthy levels [25]. In the population of DS, the prevalence of obesity and overweight are higher in other population [26]. Studies suggest that euthyroid DS children body at rest burns less amount of calories than their counterparts, and may contribute to the development of obesity [27]. Obesity as a singular disease is one of the greatest actual challenges and to achieve success in its treatment the set of scientific data and the patient individualization are needed. This is not different in DS children population that with proper exercise and nutrition-based interventions may have a greater chance to live a better and healthier life [14].

Overweight and obesity are usually related to poorer cognition across lifespan [28]; however, the association between BMI and cognitive function is less significant in adults [29], partly due to inaccurate measurement of body fat. Indirect evidence has shown an association between western high fat diet and impaired cognitive functions [30]. Overweight is identified by metabolically active and

Biochemical results

Diet lowered but not significantly the plasma levels of leptin hormone, IL-1 and IL-6, while the diet and physical therapy in combination reduced significantly the plasma levels of leptin, IL-1 and IL-6 (Table 1).

way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test reprogrammed fat tissue that enhances local alteration and inflammation of cytokine levels [31].

Our data showed that the serum levels of IL-1 and IL-6 were significantly increased in patients with DS. These findings are in accordance with Carta et al. who reported that levels of cytokines in DS patients were higher [32]. Our results showed that the physical therapy reduced but not significantly the leptin hormone, IL-1 and IL-6 levels in obese children with Down syndrome, while the physical therapy and diet significantly lowered the leptin hormone, IL-1 and IL-6. These findings are in agreement with Servidi et al. who reported that obesity are an essential reason for diabetes, hypertention, coronary, artery disease. Hence, the dietary modification and the lifestyle modification are important to keep the health. The serum leptin levels and its relation with existing obesity can be used as a predictor for obesity in children with DS [33].

Other than BMI, obesity is also related to cognitive performance and structural brain alterations. Obesity and fat content is inversely related to attention and verbal memory and is found to be associated with smaller hippocampus and larger ventricular volume. There is also a negative correlation between waist-to-hip ratio and hippocampal volume and a positive correlation between waist to- hip ratio and white matter hyperintensities [34].

Conclusions

Obesity or even being overweight is a common disorder among children with DS in the early school age (6-9 years). The combination of physical activity with nutritional intervention is an effective method for weight reduction in obese children with DS. One of the most objective parameter for the benefit of weight reduction is the inflammatory biomarkers, leptin, IL-1, and IL-6.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt. Principal investigator: Assistant Professor Doctor. Ayman Kilany, Project number 11010104.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

References

  1. Ando S, Gelsomino L, Panza S, Giordano C, Bonfigilio D, Baron I and Catalano S: Obesity, leptin and breast cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Cancers 2019; 11(62):1- 27.
  2. Wang F, Wild TC, Kipp W, Kuhle S and Veugelers PJ: The influence of childhood obesity on the development of self-esteem. Health Reports 2009; 20(2): 21- 27.
  3. Bandini LG, Curtin C, Hamad C, Tybor DJ and Must A: Prevalence of overweight in children with developmental disorders in the continuous national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 1999- 2002. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 738- 743.
  4. Restivo MR, McKinnon MC, Frey BN, Hall GB and Taylor VH: Effect of obesity on cognition in adults with and without a mood disorder: study design and methods. BMJ Open 2016; 29; 6(2): e009347.
  5. Davis CL and Cooper S: Fitness, fatness, cognition, behavior, and academic achievement among overweight children: do cross-sectional associations correspond to exercise trial outcomes?. Preventive Medicine 2011; 52: S65–S69.
  6. Schwartz DHG, Leonard M and Perron et al.: Visceral fat is associated with lower executive functioning in adolescents. International Journal of Obesity 2013; 37(10): 1336–1343.
  7. Helma BM, van Gameren-Oosterom, Paula van Dommelen, Yvonne Schönbeck, Anne Marie, Oudesluys-Murphy, Jacobus P, van Wouwe and Simone EB: Prevalence of overweight in dutch children with Down syndrome. Pediatrics 2012; 130: e1520–e1526.
  8. Mark RE and Griffin WS: Trisomy 21 and the brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2004; 63: 679- 685.
  9. Naerland T, Bakke KA, Storvik S, Warner G and Howlin P: Age and gender-related differences in emotional and behavioural problems and autistic features in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: a survey-based study of 674 individuals. J Intellect Disabil Res 2017; 61(6):594-603.
  10. Kenis G, Teunissen CH and De Jongh R et al.: Stability of interleukin 6, soluble interleukin 6 receptor, interleukin 10, and CC16 in human serum. Cytokine 2002; 19: 228- 235.
  11. Smigielska-Kuzia J, Sendrowski K, Jakubiuk-Tomaszuk A, Bockowski L, Olchowik B and Cholewa M et al.: Proinflammatory plasma cytokines in patients with Down syndrome. Neurologia Dziecieca 2012; 21: 19- 25.
  12. Park E, Alberti J and Mehta P et al.: Partial impairment of immune functions in peripheral blood leukocytes from aged men with Down’s syndrome. Clin Immunol 2000; 95: 62- 69.
  13. Zemel BS, PipanM, Stallings VA, Hall W and Schadt K et al.: Growth Charts for Children with Down syndrome in the United States. Pediatrics 2015; 136: 1204- 1211.
  14. Artioli T: Understanding obesity in Down’s syndrome children. J Obes Metab 2017; 1(1): 1-3.
  15. Barlow SE and the Expert Committee: Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics 2007; 120: S164—S192.
  16. Eknoyn GP and Gorabed SN: Neurohormonal- cytokine interactions: implications for inflammation. common human diseases and well-beigg. Neurochem Int 2008; 52: 40- 51.
  17. Christopher Duggan, John, B, Watkins W and Allan Walker: Health and Fitness, 2008.
  18. Rauch F: Vibration therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51(4): 166-
  19. Waddington GS and Adams RD: The effect of a 5- week whole-board exercise intervention on ability to discriminate different degrees of ankle inversion, barefoot and wearing shoes: a study in healthy elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2004; 52(4): 573- 576.
  20. Laufer Y, Dickstein R, Chefez Y and Marcovitz E: The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation. A randomized study 2001; 38(1): 69- 78.
  21. Cesari P, Formenti F and Olivato P: A common perceptual parameter for stair climbing for children, young and old adults. Human Movement Science 2003; 22: 111- 124.
  22. Londraville RL et al.: Comparative endocrinology for leptin: assessing function in a phylogenetic context. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2014; 203: 146- 157.
  23. Bjorbaek C and Kahn BB: Leptin signaling in the central nervous system and the periphery. Recent Prog Hom Res 2004; 59: 305- 332.
  24. Cooper-Brown L, Copeland S, Daiiley S, Downey D and Petersen MC et al.: Feeding and swallowing dysfunction in genetic syndromes. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2008; 14: 147-157.
  25. Wong C, Dwyer J and Holland M: Overcoming weight problems in adults with Down syndrome. Nutrition Today 2014; 49(3): 109- 119.
  26. Melville C, Cooper SA, Morrison J, Allan L, Smiley E and Williamson A: The prevalence and determinants of obesity in adults with intellectual disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2007; 21 (5): 425- 437.
  27. Bull MJ: Health supervision for children with Down Syndrome. Pediatrics 2011; 128: 393- 406.
  28. Prickett C, Brennan L and Stolwyk R: Examining the relationship between obesity and cognitive function: a systematic literature review. Obesity Research and Clinical Practice 2015; 9( 2): 93–113.
  29. Dahl AK and Hassing LB: Obesity and cognitive aging. Epidemiologic Reviews 2013; 35 (1): 22–32.
  30. Francis H and Stevenson R: The longer-term impacts of Western diet on human cognition and the brain. Appetite 2013; 63: 119–128.
  31. Laudisio D, Muscogiuri G, Barrea I, Savastano S and Colao A: Obesity and breast cancer in premenopausal women: current evidence and further perspectives. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018; 230: 217- 221.
  32. Carta MG, Serra P and Ghiani A et al.: Chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines in Down’s syndrome: an early marker for Alzheimer-type dementia?. Psychother Psychosom 2002; 71: 233- 236.
  33. Sridevi S, Adalarasan N, Babu RN, Sathyamurthi B, Seeralar ATA, Srilakshmi R and Anadan H: Serum leptin levels in Down’s syndrome versus normal children. International Journal of Scientific Study 2016; 4(2): 175- 178.
  34. Isaac VS, Sim H, Zheng V, Zagorodnov E, Shyong Tai and Chee M: Adverse associations between visceral adiposity, brain structure, and cognitive performance in healthy elderly. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2011; 3: 12- 18.