Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 5, Issue 4, 2018, pp. 12-19

Superoxide dismutases from the camel plasma: Purification and characterization of two copper/zinc isoforms

Hassan M.M. Masoud1, Mohamed S. Helmy1, Mahmoud A. Ibrahim1

1Molecular Biology Department, National Research Centre, El-Tahrir st., Dokki, Giza, Egypt
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2018.v5.i04.pp12-19 | Published: 2018-10-05 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a metalloenzyme that represents the initial defense line versus oxidative stress as it dismutates the superoxide ions to hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. SODs have broad medical applications in clinical nutrition, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Here, two superoxide dismutases designated camel plasma superoxide dismutase 1 (CPSOD1) and camel plasma superoxide dismutase 2 (CPSOD2) were purified from camel plasma using ammonium sulfate fractionation and chromatography on anion exchanger and gel filtration columns. CPSOD1 had a native molecular weight of about 240 kDa, whereas two bands with molecular weights of 65 kDa and 55 kDa were found on SDS–PAGE suggesting it to be heterotetramer. CPSOD2 exhibited monomeric structure with molecular weight of 60 kDa. The pI values are evaluated at pH 6.9 and pH 6.2 for the two SODs. CoCl2, CuCl2, MgCl2, NiCl2 and ZnCl2 activated CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 while CaCl2, FeCl2 and MnCl2 inhibited them. The activity of both isoenzymes is inhibited with KCN and H2O2. CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 are proposed to be copper/zinc containing isoenzymes

Keywords: Superoxide dismutase; Camel plasma; Purification; Characterization; isoenzymes; copper/zinc

Introduction

Free radicals are a set of highly active chemical molecules with one or more unpaired electrons and can cause oxidative modifications for biomolecules. The most serious free radicals are the oxygen derivatives recognized as reactive oxygen species (ROS). The antioxidant defense systems save cells from poisonous influences of ROS and all organisms maintain equilibrium between their own free radicals and antioxidants. When this equilibrium break, a state called oxidative stress arises that the antioxidants cannot dispose of free radicals and causes too much increase in ROS that harms biological systems [1-3]. ROS may cause lipid peroxidation, membrane fluidity disruption, apoptosis initiation in the mitochondria, amino acid modifications, peptide chains fragmentation, enzymes inactivation, DNA deletions, mutations, base degeneration, single-strand breaking and cross-linking of proteins [4-6]. ROS can undergo neutralization process by the antioxidant defense system either by enzymatic or non-enzymatic molecules.

The enzymatic antioxidant system comprises enzymes as superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase [7, 8].

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is broadly propagated metalloenzyme that protects against oxidative stress from superoxide radicals [9-11]. SODs stimulate the transformation of superoxide ions to O2 and H2O2 to keep tissues from poisonous oxidants yielded through oxidative operations [12, 13]. Thereafter, catalase is securely breaks down the hydrogen peroxide into H2O and O2 [14]. SODs are existed in almost whole organisms which consume oxygen [10, 15]. The SODs are categorized into four kinds on the basis of the metal ions existing in the active site [16]. Copper-zinc SOD (CuZnSOD), manganese SOD (MnSOD), iron SOD (FeSOD) and nickel SOD (NiSOD) [13, 17, 18]. The four kinds can be found in prokaryotes, while in eukaryotes FeSOD is found in chloroplasts, MnSOD is found in mitochondria and peroxisomes, and CuZnSOD is exist in chloroplasts, cytosol and extracellular spaces [15, 19, 20, 21]. It was demonstrated that SOD activity is dispensable for normal animal life-span and needed to survive acute stresses [22]. SOD had wide commercial uses in clinical nutrition, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals [23]. SOD was used as candidate antioxidant drug in different diseases and augmentation of antioxidant defenses [24]. SOD has been administered as therapeutic agent in hypoxic/ischemic cerebral injury, ischemic reperfusion and cerebral edema [13. 25]. SOD derivative drugs are efficient in controlling hypertension [26], reducing hypoxic-ischemic brain damage [27, 28] and treating endothelial cell dysfunction [29] and are likely useful antitumor drug targets [30]. Therefore, the aim of this study is purification and characterization of SOD from the camel plasma for its wide therapeutic applications.

Materials and methods

Preparation of camel plasma

The camel plasma was obtained by centrifugation of mixture of 900 ml of camel blood and 100 ml of 0.11 M trisodium citrate solution at 2700 x g for 15 min at 4°C. If the plasma was not used immediately, it was dispended into eppendorf tubes and stored at -40°C [31].

Chemicals

Phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), xanthine sodium salt, xanthine oxidase enzyme, diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DEAE-cellulose), Nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBT), Phenazine methosulfate (PMS), isoelectric focusing (IEF) standard markers mixture pI 3.6 - 9.3, molecular weight marker kits for gel filtration and Sephacryl S-300 were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. All other chemicals were of analytical grade.

Assay of superoxide dismutase activity

The SOD activity assay reaction mixture contained in a total volume of 1.0 ml of 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.8, containing 0.01 mM cytochrome C, 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.05 mM sodium xanthine. The reaction was started by adding 21 mU xanthine oxidase enzyme. One unit of SOD activity is defined as the amount of enzyme giving 50% inhibition on cytochrome C reduction at 550 nm [32].

Staining of SOD activity

Detection of SOD activity is usually achieved by a system containing nitroblue tetrazolium salt (NBT) and phenazine methosulfate (PMS) that generate superoxide anions when reoxidized in daylight. The superoxide anions in turn, reduce NBT to an insoluble formazan. Achromatic zones indicate where the deficiency of superoxide radicals, due to the SOD activity, prevented the reduction of NBT. After electrophoresis, the gel was submerged in 50 ml 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 8.6, containing 20 mg NBT and traces of PMS. Gels are then exposed for several minutes to daylight until achromatic zones appear on a blue background, indicating the presence of SOD activity [33].

Purification of camel plasma superoxide dismutases Ammonium sulfate precipitation

The camel plasma was brought to 80% saturation by gradually adding solid (NH4)2SO4 and stirred for 30 min at 4°C. The pellet was obtained by centrifugation at 12000 x g for 30 min and dissolved in 0.02 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 and dialyzed extensively against the same buffer.

DEAE-cellulose column chromatography

The dialyzed sample was chromatographed on DEAE- cellulose column (12 x 2.4 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 0.02 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4. The adsorbed proteins were eluted with a stepwise NaCl gradient ranging from 0 to 1 M prepared in the equilibration buffer at a flow rate of 60 ml/hour. 5 ml fractions were collected and the fractions containing SOD activity were pooled and concentrated by lyophilization.

Sephacryl S-300 column chromatography

The concentrated solution containing the SOD activity was applied onto Sephacryl S-300 column (142 cm x 1.75 cm i.d.). The column was equilibrated and developed with 0.02 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4 at a flow rate of 30 ml/hour and 2 ml fractions were collected.

Electrophoretic analysis

Native gel electrophoresis was carried out with 7% PAGE [34]. SDS-PAGE was performed with 12% polyacrylamide gel [35]. The subunit molecular weights of the purified SOD isoenzymes were determined by SDS-PAGE [36]. Electrofocusing was performed and the isoelectric point (pI) values were calculated from a calibration curve [37, 38]. The proteins were stained with 0.25% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.

Protein determination

Protein was determined by the dye binding assay method using BSA as a standard protein [39].

Results

Purification of SOD isoenzymes from camel plasma

A purification scheme of camel plasma SODs is given in table (1). The ammonium sulfate fraction elution profile on DEAE-cellulose column (Figure 1a) manipulated two major SOD activity peaks which designated CPSOD1 eluted with 0.0 M NaCl and CPSOD2 eluted with 0.1 M NaCl. The fractions comprising SOD activity of each peak were collected, lyophilized and loaded through Sephacryl S-300 column that revealed one SOD activity peak for CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 (Figure 1b and 1c). The CPSOD1 specific activity is 75.9 units / mg protein representing 27.7% recovery, while CPSOD2 specific activity is 17.5 units / mg protein representing 17.5% recovery (Table 1).

Molecular weight determination and Electrophoretic analysis of CPSODs

The intact molecular weights of CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 obtained from Sephacryl S-300 column are concluded from a standardization curve as 240 ± 2.4 kDa and 60 ± 1.6 kDa. Electrophoretic analysis of samples from the various purification phases; camel plasma, (NH4)2SO4

Figure 1. (a) A typical elution profile for the camel plasma ammonium sulfate fraction on DEAE-cellulose column (12 cm x 2.4 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 0.02 M K-phosphate buffer pH 7.4. (b) Typical elution profile for the chromatography of the concentrated pooled DEAE-cellulose fractions CPSOD1 on Sephacryl S-300 column (142 cm x 1.75 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 0.02 M K-phosphate buffer pH 7.4. (c) Typical elution profile for the
Figure 1. (a) A typical elution profile for the camel plasma ammonium sulfate fraction on DEAE-cellulose column (12 cm x 2.4 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 0.02 M K-phosphate buffer pH 7.4. (b) Typical elution profile for the chromatography of the concentrated pooled DEAE-cellulose fractions CPSOD1 on Sephacryl S-300 column (142 cm x 1.75 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 0.02 M K-phosphate buffer pH 7.4. (c) Typical elution profile for the

chromatography of the concentrated pooled DEAE-cellulose fractions CPSOD2 on Sephacryl S-300 column (142 cm x

1.75 cm i.d.) previously equilibrated with 0.02 M K-phosphate buffer pH 7.4.

fraction, DEAE-cellulose fraction and Sephacryl S-300 fraction of CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 on 7 % native PAGE was carried out (Figure 2). Odd protein bands met the isoforms displayed single molecular species with pI values of 6.9 for CPSOD1 and 6.2 for CPSOD2.

Table 1. A typical purification scheme of SOD isoenzymes from camel plasma.
Table 1. A typical purification scheme of SOD isoenzymes from camel plasma.
Table 2. Effect of divalent cations on the purified camel plasma CPSOD1 and CPSOD2.
Table 2. Effect of divalent cations on the purified camel plasma CPSOD1 and CPSOD2.

* These values represent % of the control and the means of triplicate experiments.

Table 3. Effect of inhibitors on the purified camel plasma CPSOD1 and CPSOD2.
Table 3. Effect of inhibitors on the purified camel plasma CPSOD1 and CPSOD2.

* These values represent % of the control and the means of triplicate experiments.

Figure 2. Electrophoretic analysis of protein and SOD isoenzyme patterns on 7% native PAGE. (a) CPSOD1 protein pattern, (b) CPSOD1 isoenzyme pattern, (c) CPSOD2 protein pattern and (d) CPSOD2 isoenzyme pattern: (1) Camel plasma, (2) Ammonium sulfate fraction, (3) DEAE-cellulose fraction and (4) Sephacryl S-300 fraction.
Figure 2. Electrophoretic analysis of protein and SOD isoenzyme patterns on 7% native PAGE. (a) CPSOD1 protein pattern, (b) CPSOD1 isoenzyme pattern, (c) CPSOD2 protein pattern and (d) CPSOD2 isoenzyme pattern: (1) Camel plasma, (2) Ammonium sulfate fraction, (3) DEAE-cellulose fraction and (4) Sephacryl S-300 fraction.
Figure 3. (a) Subunit molecular weight determination of CPSOD1 on 12 % SDS-PAGE: (1) Low molecular weight marker proteins, (2) denatured purified CPSOD1, (3) Native purified CPSOD1 and (4) High molecular weight marker proteins. (b) Subunit molecular weight determination of CPSOD2 on 12 % SDS-PAGE: (1) molecular weight marker proteins and (2) denatured purified CPSOD2. (c) Isoelectrofocusing PAGE: (1) CPSOD1, (2) Isoelectric point ( pI)
Figure 3. (a) Subunit molecular weight determination of CPSOD1 on 12 % SDS-PAGE: (1) Low molecular weight marker proteins, (2) denatured purified CPSOD1, (3) Native purified CPSOD1 and (4) High molecular weight marker proteins. (b) Subunit molecular weight determination of CPSOD2 on 12 % SDS-PAGE: (1) molecular weight marker proteins and (2) denatured purified CPSOD2. (c) Isoelectrofocusing PAGE: (1) CPSOD1, (2) Isoelectric point ( pI)

marker proteins and (3) CPSOD2.

Discussion

Superoxide dismutases are important enzymes with different industrial and medical applications. SOD was used as a drug in cerebral and hypertension diseases, treating inflammation and preventing the alcohol induced hangover. It proliferated in industry of cosmetics and supplementary products utilized in skin protection. SOD is also utilized as a preservative of transplanted organs, sperms, food stuffs and laundry ingredients [11, 22, 40, 41]. This study outlines an easy purification method for SOD isoenzymes from the camel plasma. The separation technique was achieved by ammonium sulfate deposition, anion exchange chromatography on DEAE-cellulose matrix and gel-filtration chromatography on Sephacryl S- 300 resins. Comparable purification processes of SODs were stated like tea clone SOD [42], Leishmania infantum SOD [43], shrimp muscle tissue SOD [10], hens eggs SOD [44] and mangrove tree SOD [45]. In this study, the DEAE-cellulose chromatographical separation analyzed the SOD activity into two isoenzymes named CPSOD1 and CPSOD2. The Sephacryl S-300 resin analyzed each isoform as a single SOD activity peak and deduced their molecular weights as 240 ± 2.4 kDa for CPSOD1 and 60 ± 1.6 kDa for CPSOD2 (Fig. 1). The total yield of the two isoenzymes after size exclusion is 45.2% recovery.

CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 were purified 26.2 and 24.4 folds over the crude plasma (Table 1). A big diversity of purification folds and recovery percentages for SOD were stated; from Leishmania peruviana 103.7folds and 70% yield, from Leishmania amazonensis 101.6 folds and 86% yield [46], from tea clone 51 folds with 3.77% yield [42], from yeast 28.5 folds and 53% yield [47] and from black soybean 15.4 folds and 29.4% yield [48].

The two camel plasma SOD isoenzymes showed the appearance of one protein band that matched the SOD activity band affirmed the purity of CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 preparations (Figure 2). Comparing the subunit molecular weights of CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 with their native intact protein masses obtained from the gelfiltration columns revealed that CPSOD1 is heterotetramer protein consisted of four polypeptides while CPSOD2 is monomer protein (Fig. 3). Various SODs were stated with different molecular weights like; 28 kDa garlic SOD [49], 31 kDa black soybean SOD [48], 33 kDa hens eggs SOD [44], 31 kDa mangrove tree SOD [45], 34.8 kDa pumpkin pulp SOD [50], 66.1 kDa oriental river prawn SOD [51] and 40 kDa, 67 kDa and 90 kDa camel tick larvae SODs [52]. High molecular weights tetrameric SODs were stated in bacteria ranging from 110 to 140 kDa [53] 125 kDa yeast SOD [54] and 169 kDa tea leaves SOD [42]. The purified camel plasma (pI) values of 6.9 and 6.2 (Fig. 3b). Analogous pI values were stated as bacteria SOD isoenzymes pI values of 5.9, 6.15, 6.35, 6.6 and 7.5 [54], fish SODs isoenzymes pIs of 5.9, 6.0 and 6.2 [55], black soybean SOD pI of 5.6 [48] and camel tick larvae SODs pIs of 8, 7.2 and 6.6 [52]. CoCl , CuCl , MgCl , NiCl and ZnCl increased the 2 2 2 2 2 activity of both preparations CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 while CaCl , FeCl and MnCl decreased it (Table 2) 2 2 2 +2 +2 affirming the involvement of Cu and Zn for CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 action. ZnCl is involved for SOD of 2 bacteria [56] and shrimp muscle tissue [10]. Recognition of various SODs types is depending on the characteristic inhibition by certain chemical compounds. The SODs classes can be specified by their sensitivity to potassium cyanide and hydrogen peroxide inhibition [9, 10, 48].

+2 +2 Also, existence of Cu and Zn in the SOD active site was affirmed by KCN and H O inhibition [54]. It was 2 2 stated that, CuZnSOD isoenzymes are sensitive to both KCN and H O [58-60]. Here, KCN and H O inhibited 2 2 2 2 the activity of CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 potently (Table 3) affirming that both preparations are powerfully proposed to be copper-zinc SOD isoenzymes. Various SOD types were purified; Cu/Zn-SOD from eggs hens [44], Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast [47], black soybean [48], pumpkin [50], haemolymph of oriental river prawn [51], camel tick larvae [52], Japanese flounder [55] and bay scallop [12]. Mn-SOD was purified from tea leaves [42], muscle tissue of the shrimp [10] and camel tick larvae [52]. Also, Fe-SOD was purified from Leishmania peruviana and Leishmania amazonensis [43]. β- Mercaptoethanol and dithiothreitol inhibited both CPSOD1 and CPSOD2 isoenzymes activity affirming involvement of thiol groups in their structure and action as in case of Radix lethospermi seed SOD [61]. PMSF inhibited both isoenzymes activity suggesting the presence of serine residue in both isoenzymes active sites. In conclusion, this is the first study reporting SOD from camel plasma. It provides an appropriate purification method for two Cu/Zn-SODs that could be fundamental for averting oxidative stress. These SOD isoenzymes may be used as important agents in cosmetics and supplementary products industry and as candidate drugs for treating of various diseases.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Research Centre, Egypt.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

References

  1. Agarwal A, Cocuzza M, Abdelrazik H, Sharma RK 2008. Oxidative stress measurement in patients with male or female factor infertility. In: "Handbook of chemiluminescent methods in oxidative stress assessment" (Edited by Popov I., and Lewin G.,) Transworld Research Network, Kerala, India. 195-218.
  2. Rabbani Z, Jackson I, ZhangX, Xu P, Vujaskovic Z. Subcutaneous administration of bovine superoxide dismutase protects lungs from radiation induced lung injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78(3): S39-S40.
  3. Carillon J, Rouanet J, Cristol J, Brion R. Superoxide dismutase administration, a potential therapy against oxidative stress related diseases: Several routes of supplementation and proposal of an original mechanism of action. Pharm Res. 2013; 13:1113-1115.
  4. Imlay JA. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003; 57: 395-418.
  5. Jena NR. DNA damage by reactive species: Mechanisms, mutation and repair. J Biosci. 2012; 37(3):503-517.
  6. Cai Z, Yan L. Protein oxidative modifications: Beneficial Roles in Disease and health. J Biochem Pharmacol Res. 2013; 1(1): 15-26.
  7. Ventura-Aguilar RI, Rivera-Cabrera F, Mendez-Iturbide D, PelayoZaldıvar C, Bosquez-Molina S. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems of minimally processed cactus stems (Opuntia ficus-indica Mill.) packaged under modified atmospheres. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2013; 48: 2603-2612.
  8. Lubrano V, Balzan S. Enzymatic antioxidant system in vascular inflammation and coronary artery disease. World J Exp Med. 2015; 5(4): 218-224.
  9. Babitha MP, Prakash HS, Shetty HS. Purification and partial characterization of manganese superoxide dismutase from downy mildew resistant pearl millet seedlings inoculated with Sclerospora graminicola. Plant Sci. 2002; 163: 917-924.
  10. Yao C, Wang A, Wang W, Sun R. Purification and partial characterization of Mn superoxide dismutase from muscle tissue of the shrimp Macrobrachium nipponense. Aquaculture 2004; 241: 621-631.
  11. Gopal RK, Elumalai S. Industrial production of superoxide dismutase (SOD): A mini review. J Prob Health 2017; 5:3.
  12. Bao Y, Li L, Xu F, Zhang G. Intracellular copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from bay scallop Argopecten irradians: Its gene structure, mRNA expression and recombinant protein. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2009; 27: 210-220.
  13. Ghosh K, Tyagi N, Kumar P, Singh U, Goel N. Stabilization of Mn (II) and Mn (III) in mononuclear complexes derived from tridentate ligands with N2O donors: Synthesis, crystal structure, superoxide dismutase activity and DNA interaction studies. J Inorg Biochem. 2010; 104: 9-18.
  14. Terevinto A, Ramos A, Castroman G, Cabrera M, Saadoun A. Oxidative status, in vitro iron-induced lipid oxidation and superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase activities in rhea meat. Meat Sci. 2010; 84: 706-710.
  15. Törő I, Petrutz C, Pacello F, Orazio MD, Battistoni A, Carugo KD. Structural basis of heme binding in the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase from Haemophilus ducreyi. J Mol Biol. 2009; 386: 406-418.
  16. Bittencourt SET, Castro LA, Farias SE, Bao SN, Schrank A, Vainstein MH. Purification and ultrastructral localization of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from entomopathogenic and a caricide fungus Metarhizium anisopiia. Res Microbiol. 2004; 155: 681-687.
  17. Miao L, Daret K, Clair S. Regulation of superoxide dismutase genes: Implications in disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2009; 47: 344-356.
  18. Abreu IA, Cabelli DE. Superoxide dismutases—a review of the metalassociated mechanistic variations. Biochim Biophys Act. 2010; 1804: 263-
  19. ÖztÜrk-Ürek R, Tarhan L. Purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from chicken liver. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2001; 128: 205-
  20. Ekanayake PM, Kang HS, Zyosa MD, Jee Y, Lee YH, Lee J. Molecular cloning and characterization of Mn-superoxide dismutase from disk abalone (Haliotis discus discus). Comp Biochem Physiol. 2006; 145: 318-
  21. Whittaker JW. Metal uptake by manganese superoxide dismutase. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1804: 298-307.
  22. Michael J, Raamsdonk V, Hekimi S. Superoxide dismutase is dispensable for normal animal lifespan. PNAS. 2012; 109 (15): 5785-5790.
  23. Desai K, Sivakami S. Purification and biochemical characterization of a superoxide dismutase from the soluble fraction of the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 23: 1661-1666.
  24. Muzykantov VR. Targeting of superoxide dismutase and catalase to vascular endothelium. J Control Release. 2001; 71: 1-21.
  25. Maier CM, Hsieh LB, Crandall T, Narasimhan P, Chan PH. Evaluating therapeutic targets for reperfusion-related brain hemorrhage. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59: 929-938.
  26. Vaziri ND, Ding Y, Ni Z. Compensatory up-regulation of nitric-oxide synthase isoforms in lead-induced hypertension: Reversal by a superoxide dismutase-mimetic drug. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001; 298: 679-685.
  27. Mehta SH, Webb RC, Ergul A, Tawfik A, Dorrance AM. Neuroprotection by tempol in a model of iron-induced oxidative stress in acute ischemic stroke. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 286: 283-288.
  28. Lee BI, Chan PH, Kim GW. Metalloporphyrin-based superoxide dismutase mimic attenuates the nuclear translocation of apoptosis inducing factor and the subsequent DNA fragmentation after permanent focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Stroke 2005, 36: 2712-2717.
  29. Jiang F, Guo Y, Salvemini D, Dusting GJ. Superoxide dismutase mimetic M40403 improves endothelial function in apolipoprotein (E)-deficient mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2003; 139: 1127-1134.
  30. Che M, Wang R, Li X, Wang H, Zheng S. Expanding roles of superoxide dismutases in cell regulation and cancer. Drug Discovery Today. 2016; 21: 143-149.
  31. Joubert AM, Crause JC, Gaspar AR, Clarke FC, Spickett AM, Neitz AW. Isolation and characterization of an anticoagulant present in the salivary glands of the bont-legged tick, Hyalomma truncatum. Exp Appl Acarol. 1995; 19: 79-92.
  32. McCord JM, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: An enzymic function for erythrocuprein (hemocuprein). J Biol Chem. 1969; 244: 6049-6055.
  33. Weisiger RA, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: Organelle specificity. J Biol Chem. 1973; 248: 3582-3592.
  34. Smith I. 1969. Acrylamide gel disc electrophoresis. In: Smith, I., (Eds.), Electrophoretic techniques, Academic press, New York. 365-515.
  35. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970; 227: 680-685.
  36. Weber K, Osborn M. The reliability of molecular weight determinations by dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Biol Chem. 1969; 244: 4406-4412.
  37. O'Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimentional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1975; 250: 4007-4021.
  38. Ubuka T, Masuoka N, Yoshida S, Ishino K. Determination of isoelectric point value of 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase by isoelectric focusing using ribonuclease A-glutathione mixed disulfides as standards. Anal Biochem. 1987; 167: 284-289.
  39. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248-254.
  40. Nelson SK, Bose S, Rizeq M, McCord JM. Oxidative stress in organ preservation: a multifaceted approach to cardioplegia. Biomed Pharmacother. 2005; 59: 149-157.
  41. Zeinali F, Homaei A, Kamrani E. Sources of marine superoxide dismutases: Characteristics and applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015; 79: 627-637.
  42. Vyas D, Kumar S. Purification and partial characterization of a low temperature responsive Mn-SOD from tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze). Biochem Biophys Res Com. 2005; 329: 831-838.
  43. Longoni SS, Marín C, Sánchez-Moreno M. Excreted Leishmania peruviana and Leishmania amazonensis iron–superoxide dismutase purification: Specific antibody detection in Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Free Rad Biol Med. 2014; 69: 26-34.
  44. Wawrzykowski J, Kankofer M. Partial biochemical characterization of Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase extracted from eggs of hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Food Chem. 2017; 227: 390-396.
  45. Zeinali F, Homaei A, Kamrania E. Identification and kinetic characterization of a novel superoxide dismutase from Avicennia marina: An antioxidant enzyme with unique features. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017; 105: 1556-1562.
  46. Longoni SS, Sánchez-Moreno M, López JER, Marín C. Leishmania infantum secreted iron superoxide dismutase purification and its application to the diagnosis of canine Leishmaniasis. Comp Immunol Microbio Inf Dis. 2013; 36: 499-506.
  47. Nedeva T, Dolashka-Angelova P, Moshtanskab V, Voelter W, Petrova V, Kujumdzieva A. Purification and partial characterization of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutases from Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast. J Chromat B. 2009; 877: 3529-3536.
  48. Wang S, Shao B, Liu S, Ye X, Rao P. Purification and characterization of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase from black soybean. Food Res Int. 2012; 47: 374-379.
  49. Liu J, Wang J, Yin M, Zhu H, Lu J, Cui Z. Purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from garlic. Food bioprod Proc. 2011; 89: 294-299.
  50. Qin X, Zhang M, Qin J, Yuan S, Hou Y, Liu J. Two-step purification of Cu,Zn-superoxide dismutase from pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) pulp. Sep Purif Tech. 2012; 87: 79-83.
  51. Yao C, Wang A, Wang Z, Wang W, Sun R. Purification and partial characterization of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase from haemolymph of oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense. Aquaculture. 2007; 270: 559-565.
  52. Ibrahim MA, Mohamed MM, Ghazy AM, Masoud HMM. Superoxide dismutases from larvae of the camel tick Hyalomma dromedarii. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2013; 164: 221-228.
  53. Barkley KB, Gregory EM. Tetrameric manganese superoxide dismutases from anaerobic Actinomyces. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990; 280: 192-200.
  54. Hamilton AJ, Holdom MD. Biochemical comparison of the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutases of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans and Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii. Infect Immun. 1997; 65: 488-494.
  55. Osatomi K, Masuda Y, Hara K, Ishihara T. Purification, N-terminal amino acid sequence and some properties of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase from Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) hepato-pancrease. Comp Biochem Physiol. 2001; 128: 751-760.
  56. Zheng Z, Jiang YH, Miao JL, Wang QF, Zhang BT, Li GY. Purification and characterization of a cold-active iron superoxide dismutase from a psychrophilic bacterium, Marinomonas sp. NJ522 Biotechnol Lett. 2006; 28: 85-88.
  57. Chen JR, Weng CN, Ho TY, Cheng IC, Lai SS. Identification of the copper-zinc superoxide dismutase activity in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vet Microbiol. 2000; 73: 301-310.
  58. Yun YS, Lee YN. Production of superoxide dismutase by Deinococcus radiophilus. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2003; 36: 282-287.
  59. Sheng L, Zheng X, Tong H, Liu S, Du J, Liu Q. Purification and characterization of cytosolic isoenzyme III of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase from tobacco leave. Plant Sci. 2004; 167: 1235-1241.
  60. He N, Li Q, Sun D, Ling X. Isolation, purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from garlic. Biochem Eng J. 2008; 38: 33-38.
  61. Haddad N, Yuan Q. Purification and some properties of Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase from Radix lethospermi seed, kind of Chinese traditional medicine. J Chromat B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005; 818: 123-