Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 108-112

Molecular screening and analysis of Genistein analogues for the identification of novel therapeutic inhibitors against estrogen receptor alpha

Megana. K.S.N.M1, Suneetha.Y 1

1Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2018.v5.i02.pp108-112 | Published: 2018-04-05 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Most common malignancy faced by women around the world today is breast cancer. Estrogen receptor alpha has been identified and play a major role in stimulating the growth of breast cancer. So in the present analysis, our focus has been on natural compounds which do not exhibit any toxicity and have significant estrogen receptor alpha inhibition activity. Several reports proposed that polyphenolic chemicals present in many plant foods, and hence these compounds have several chemo preventive properties against breast cancer. So by using molecular docking, we screened the selected natural compounds and investigated their binding affinity against the selected protein. As a result, we predict the novel therapeutic inhibitors against estrogen receptor alpha for the treatment of breast cancer.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Estrogen receptor alpha; In-Silico; Docking-virtual screening; ADMET

Introduction

Breast cancer is the well-known cancer type caused to the females around the world and it constitutes the major cause of mortality in several developing countries including India. Present day‟s breast cancer is a rising public health problem [1-3]. General risk factors for breast cancer include age, hereditary, diet, family history, heavy drinking, lack of exercise, radiation exposure, life style etc [4]. Estimated new cases of breast cancer in the United States for the year 2017 is 252,710 while recorded breast cancer deaths are 40,610 [5]. More economically developed and industrialized countries, and the economical fatality differentials have been deliberate extensively screening, and low developing countries suffer the highest mortality victims as a cause of breast cancer [6]. So overall an expected 14 million new breast cancer cases occur each year [7]. Based on the above reports the life style changes are the major factors to the development of breast cancer [8]. Daily intake of fruits and raw vegetables, which are rich in antioxidants, can decrease the risk of cancer [9].

Estrogen exposure is the major risk factor for breast cancer, so overall 50-60%of breast cancers are estrogen receptor (ER) positive. Generally, estrogen is a female sex hormone and it is important for reproductive development [10-12]. The estrogen receptor originates in two subtypes: Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ). ER alpha is mainly present in the mammary gland [13]. The targeted therapeutics of estrogen receptor has clearly been success in the medication of breast cancer [14]. Therefore the prediction of possible estrogen receptor positive drug plays a very crucial role in the future appliance. In this present analysis, our research found out the appropriate natural products with the high binding affinity with the breast cancer target protein and which can be used for the treatment of breast cancer. Natural plant products have been used to prevent various diseases and these bioactive compounds can be proved and play a positive role to decrease the breast cancer risk [15]. The most important and useful Isoflavone are genistein and it is first discovered in 1899 [16]. Genistein acts as a chemotherapeutic agent against various types of cancers and it is a major flavonoid found in legumes, particularly soya beans and soya products like textured vegetables. Isoflavones as a good therapeutic option in breast cancer chemoprevention [17]. Genistein derivatives have excellent anti-cancer isoflavone agents against breast cancer. The selected analogues have outstanding antitumor activity and good pharmacokinetic and ADMET properties. Based on its properties, these natural compounds were chosen for our study. And we aimed to predict the best inhibitors by using insilico screening and analysis of molecular docking against the active site of

Experimental

Materials and methods

Preparation of protein

The three-dimensional structure of Human estrogen receptor alpha (figure 1) with PDB: 3ERT for docking studies was selected from the protein data bank [18] (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb) serves as a target model for screening. The complexes bound to the protein molecule, the water molecules and all the heteroatoms were removed, that are not needed for docking. Hydrogen atoms were added for the receptor structure.

Figure 1. Three Dimensional Structure of Human Estrogen Receptor Alpha (3ERT).
Figure 1. Three Dimensional Structure of Human Estrogen Receptor Alpha (3ERT).

Retrieval of ligands

For screening the compounds PubChem database was used. The PubChem database is a public open repository for the biological activity of small molecules. The chemicals structures were downloaded in SDF (structure data format) from PubChem database (http://www.pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The chemical structure of ligand is shown in figure 2. A total of 18 compounds were selected for docking studies all the selected compounds can show inhibitory effects towards

Figure 2. Chemical structure of Genistein.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of Genistein.

Molecular docking

Molecular docking is one the most important method in structure based drug design. Docking was performed using Auto dock Vina in PyRx interface, an open source software [20]. The grid box was generated around the active site residues with grid center, X-Axis - 22.396 Å,Y-Axis – 5.6441 Å, Z-Axis – 21.9877Å and grid dimensions x – 48.25 Å, y - 55.54 Å, z-56.032.Å.

Drug-likeness analysis and adverse effect prediction

Lipinski‟s rule of five also called as Pfizers‟s rule of five to evaluate the drug likeness, the rule was prepared methodically by Christopher A. Lipinski in 1997 [21]. As per “Rule of 5”, the drug-like molecules have the number of hydrogen bond acceptors ≤10, number of hydrogen bond donor‟s is not more than 5, Partition coefficient log P less than (≤5) and molecular mass less than 500 daltons [22]. The pharmacokinetic properties and ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, elimination, toxicity) analysis were predicted using insilico methods. In this study Data Warrior is used for the calculation of drug-likeness and ADMET analysis. (http://www.openmolecules.org/datawarrior). Data Warrior is an open source visualization and data analysis program. It is a versatile tool and it calculates the various physicochemical properties directly from chemical structures [23].

Results and discussion

Receptor structure

Human estrogen receptor alpha has been used as an important therapeutic target for Breast Cancer. The 3- Dimensional Structure of Human estrogen receptor alpha retrieved from Protein Data Bank PDB Code: 3ERT determined by X-Ray crystallography at a resolution of 1.90Å as shown in figure 1.

Assessment of pharmacological properties

The selected compounds were tested for „rule of 5‟the results showed that all the compounds can satisfy Lipinski rule. The toxicity prediction and pharmacokinetic properties were predicted among all the 18 Compounds using Data Warrior. The data warrior results of toxicity analysis and pharmacokinetic properties were shown in table 1. The log P values and solubility were calculated for pharmacokinetic properties while mutagenicity, tumorigenicity, reproductive effect and irritation effect were predicted for Toxicity analysis. The results revealed that poor solubility is accompanying with bad absorption, and aqueous solubility substantially affects the absorption and distribution characteristics. The Data Warrior results displayed that among 18 compounds, PubChem CID: 5393152, CID: 5280863, CID: 5280443, CID: 11987653, have high mutagenic action, and five compounds i.e., CID:3764, CID: 10062691, CID: 656936, CID: 11987653, CID: 254171 showed high reproductive effect. Based on the results from data warrior the selected 18 compounds is predicted to have better log P, and good drug-likeness and less toxicity parameters as illustrate table 1.

Table 2. Ligands and Their Corresponding Binding Affinities and Interaction Energies
Table 2. Ligands and Their Corresponding Binding Affinities and Interaction Energies
Table 1. Drug likeness analysis and In silico ADMET Prediction.
Table 1. Drug likeness analysis and In silico ADMET Prediction.

PubChem Total C log P C log S H- H- ligand Id molecular acceptors donors 5284648 270.239 1.6272 -2.727 5 3 10062691 272.255 2.3791 -2.889 5 3 25271556 250.304 2.7827 -5.491 4 2 656936 226.230 3.17 -3.961 3 2 688857 240.257 2.8471 -3.232 3 1 5320693 268.267 2.9571 -3.466 4 1 5393152 254.240 2.5273 -3.379 4 2 5280863 286.238 1.8359 -2.787 6 4 439246 272.255 2.1557 -2.64 5 3 5391140 254.240 2.6814 -3.152 4 2 5281607 254.240 2.6814 -3.152 4 2 114829 256.256 2.5014 -2.936 4 2 5280443 270.239 2.3357 -2.856 5 3 3764 268.267 2.2486 -3.337 4 1 44201362 250.304 2.7827 -5.491 4 2 11987653 274.271 1.6034 -3.021 5 3 5280373 284.266 1.9029 -3.041 5 2 254171 224.211 0.7476 -2.037 5 2 Drug Mutagenic Tumorigenic Reproductive Irritant

Binding mode analysis

In this regard, we identified four PubChem compounds i.e., PubChem CID: 25271556, CID: 5284648, CID: 5320693, CID: 5391140 might be chosen as new inhibitors for estrogen receptor alpha and these four compounds having anti-cancer properties and have the high estrogen receptor binding capability. The structural analogues of the above mentioned compound CID: 5284648 having good binding energy value is -8.9 kcal/mol. This was shown interacts with Arg394, Glu353. CID: 25271556 contain binding energy value is -8.6 kcal/mol this was shown interact with His 524, Gly 420. CID: 5320693 contain binding energy value is -8.4 kcal/mol, this compound was found to interact with Arg 394, Glu 353. CID: 5391140 contain binding energy value is -8.2 kcal/mol this compound was found to interact with Arg 394 results will be elucidated in table 2 and the receptor and ligand interactions as shown in figure 3. These results may be used for generation of novel drugs against estrogen receptor alpha.

Figure 3. Docking studies of best docked derivatives with representation of binding site analysis of selected ligands with estrogen receptor alpha. A. PUBCHEM CID: 5284648
Figure 3. Docking studies of best docked derivatives with representation of binding site analysis of selected ligands with estrogen receptor alpha. A. PUBCHEM CID: 5284648

B. PUBCHEM CID: 25271556.

C. PUBCHEM CID: 5320693

D. PUBCHEM CID: 5391140.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we suggested novel therapeutic inhibitors by using a computational method structured based virtual screening, Molecular docking. The receptor-ligand interactions play a very prominent role in Drug energy value we chosen the best ligand-receptor interactions. Protein for human estrogen alpha has been taken, and new potential drugs have been recognized and these newly identified drugs can be used against Breast cancer. Pharmacokinetic properties and toxicity analysis calculated in Data warrior, most of these compounds are not suitable as drug candidates. Finally four compounds i.e., PubChemCID: 5284648, CID: 25271556, CID: 5320693 and CID: 5391140shows good binding energies and in ADMET analysis these analogues have excellent pharmacokinetic and drug-likeness properties. Hence, these four compounds having anti-cancer activity and these analogues could be used for designing therapeutic lead molecules. Further analysis is needed to investigate the interactions of the above selected ligands with estrogen receptor alpha can be used for in vivo and in vitro experiments.

Acknowledgements

MK is thankful to university grants commission, New Delhi for financial support in the form of UGC– BSR (RFSMS) Senior Research Fellowship. Y.S. is thankful to Human Resource Development for Health Research, New Delhi (F.No.V.25011/542-HRD/2016-HR).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

References

  1. Eccles SA, Aboagye EO, Ali S, Anderson AS, Armes J, Berditchevski F, Blaydes JP, Brennan K, Brown NJ, Bryant HE, Bundred NJ, Burchell JM, Campbell AM, Carroll JS, Clarke RB, Coles CE, Cook GJ, Cox A, Curtin NJ, Dekker LV, Silva Idos S, Duffy SW, Easton DF, Eccles DM, Edwards DR, Edwards J, Evans D, Fenlon DF, Flanagan JM, Foster C, Gallagher WM, Garcia-Closas M, Gee JM, Gescher AJ, Goh V, Groves AM, Harvey AJ, Harvie M, Hennessy BT, Hiscox S, Holen I, Howell SJ, Howell A, Hubbard G, Hulbert-Williams N, Hunter MS, Jasani B, Jones LJ, Key TJ, Kirwan CC, Kong A, Kunkler IH, Langdon SP, Leach MO, Mann DJ, Marshall JF, Martin L, Martin SG, Macdougall JE, Miles DW, Miller WR, Morris JR, Moss SM, Mullan P, Natrajan R, O'Connor JP, O'Connor R, Palmieri C, Pharoah PD, Rakha EA, Reed E, Robinson SP, Sahai E, Saxton JM, Schmid P, Smalley MJ, Speirs V, Stein R, Stingl J, Streuli CH, Tutt AN, Velikova G, Walker RA, Watson CJ, Williams KJ, Young LS, Thompson AM: Critical research gaps and Translational Priorities for the successful Prevention and treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 2013; 15(5):R92.
  2. Arnold M, Karim-Kos HE, Coebergh JW, Byrnes G, Antilla A, Ferlay J, RenehanAG, Forman D, Soerjomataram I: Recent trends in incidence of five commoncancers in 26 European countries since 1988:Analysis of the EuropeanCancer Observatory European. Journal of Cancer 2015; 51(9):1164-87.
  3. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM: Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Research 2014; 74:2913–2921.
  4. Colditz GA, Bohlke K: Priorities for the primary prevention of breast cancer. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2014; 64:186–194.
  5. Rebacca L, Siegel MPH, Kimberly D, Miller MPH, Ahmedin Jemal DVM: Cancer statistics. CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2017; 67:7-30.
  6. SorliePD, Backlund E and Keller JB: US mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. American Journal of Public Health 1995; 85(7): 949-
  7. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A: Global
  8. Hurvitz SA, Pietras RJ: Rational management of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of estrogen receptor biology, treatment options, and future directions. Cancer 2008; 113(9): 2385-2397.
  9. McKeown, N: Antioxidants and breast cancer. Nutrition Reviews 1999; 57:321-324.
  10. Jones KL, Buzdar AU: A review of adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer. Endocrine Related Cancer 2004; 11(3): 391-406.
  11. Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li, CI: Hormone receptor status, Tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Research 2007; 9 (1):R6.
  12. PikeMC, Spicer DV, Dahmoush L, and Press, MF: Estrogens, progesterone‟s, normal breast cell proliferation and breast cancer risk. Epidemiologic Review 1993; 15(1):17-35.
  13. Welboren WJ, Sweep FC, Span PN, Stunnenberg HG: Genomic actions of estrogen receptor alpha: what are the targets and how are they regulated. Endocrine Related Cancer 2009; 16(4):1073–1089.
  14. Shaaban AM, Sloane JP, West CR, Foster CS: Breast cancer risk in usual ductal hyperplasia is defined by estrogen receptor-alpha and Ki-67 expression. The American Journal of Pathology 2002; 160 (2): 597-604.
  15. Davies, G: Time Tables of Medicine. Black Dog & Leventhal. New York: 2000.
  16. Polkowski K,Mazurek AP: Biological properties of Genistein. A review of in vitro and in vivo data: Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica 2000; 57(2):135–155.
  17. Fang CY, Tseng M, Daly MB: Correlates of soy food consumption in women at increased risk for breast cancer. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2005; 105(10):1552–1558.
  18. Dykstra KD, Guo L, Birzin ET, Chan W, Yang YT, Hayes EC, Da Silva CA, Pai LY, Mosley RT, Kraker B, Fitzgerald PM, Di Ninno F, Rohrer SP, Schaeffer JM and Hammond ML: Estrogen receptor ligands. Part 16: 2-Aryl indoles as highly subtype selective ligands for ER alpha. Bio organic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2007; 17(8):2322–2328.
  19. Yanli Wang, Evan Bolton, Svetlana Dracheva, Karen Karapetyan, Benjamin A, Shoemaker, Tugba O, Suzek, Jiyao Wang, Jewen Xiao, Jian Zhang, and Stephen H, Bryant: An overview of the Pubchem bioassay resource. Nucleic acids research 2010; 38:D255–D266.
  20. DallakyanS, Olson AJ: Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Chemical Biology 2015; 1263:243–250.
  21. Lipinski, CA: "Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution". Drug Discovery Today. Technologies 2004; 1 (4): 337–341.
  22. Lipinski, CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ: Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2001; 46 (1-3): 3–26.
  23. Von Korff M, and Sander T: Toxicity-indicating structural patterns. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling 2006; 46: 536−544.