Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 5, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 53-57

Effects of fly ash and P. hysterophorus on the antioxidant status of earthworm (Eisenia fetida)

Suman Sharma1, Harsimran Kaur2

1Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala-147002, Punjab, India
2Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala-147002, Punjab. India
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2018.v5.i02.pp53-57 | Published: 2018-04-05 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Fly ash is a serious source of air pollution since it remains air borne for a long period of time and causes health hazards. Parthenium hysterophorus is one among the most troublesome weeds at the global level. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of fly ash and parthenium weed on antioxidant status of earthworm, Eisenia fetida. Earthworms were allowed to grow in the mixture of cow dung: fly ash (60:40) and cow dung: parthenium (75:25) for 60 days. The biochemical markers viz. catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and malondialdehyde (MDA) level were measured at day 15, 30, 45 and 60. The results revealed increased MDA level, while SOD, GPx and CAT activities showed variation in both the treatments. The study indicated that fly ash and Parthenium hysterophorus has adverse biological effects on the model organism Eisenia fetida

Keywords: Fly ash; Parthenium hysterophorus; Eisenia fetida; Antioxidant enzymes

Introduction

Large scale industrialization, urbanization and population growth have affected the healthy relationship between man and nature. Various human activities generate huge quantities of solid wastes throughout the world and their management has become a technical and ecological challenge for all. Most of the wastes are disposed in ecologically unsustainable manner by open dumping or burning [1]. Production of large quantities of organic waste all over the world poses major environmental (offensive odors, contamination of ground water and soil) and disposal problems [2].

Fly ash, a resultant of combustion of coal at high temperature, has been regarded as a problematic solid waste all over the world [3]. A massive amount of fly ash (4750 million tons) is generated worldwide from coalbased thermal power plants [4]. Recently it has started receiving alarming attention due to its hazardous nature, wide spread usage, and the manner of disposal; leading to severe environmental pollution [5, 6]. India generates higher amount of fly ash and utilizes lower percentage of fly ash compared to other countries. Therefore, major portion of it is disposed in ash ponds near the power plants occupying more than 65,000 acres of land [7, 8].

These ash ponds have become a potential source for contamination of soil and water streams [7, 9, 10].

Leaching and accumulation of organic and inorganic toxic compounds from fly ash is of major environmental concern and known to have severe adverse impact such as bioaccumulation of metals, oxidative stress, DNA damage and reproduction on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems [8, 11-13].

Parthenium hysterophorus is one of the top ten worst weeds of the world and has been listed in the global invasive species database [14]. P. hysterophorus is an invasive alien weed of global significance [15]. The sesquiterpene lactones namely parthenin and coronopilin present in the trichomes of leaves and stems of Parthenium, are responsible for causing various allergies like contact dermatitis, hay fever, asthma and bronchitis in human beings [15, 16 ]. P. hysterophorus is poisonous to livestock when it is consumed or repeatedly in contact with the weed. Those animals can encounter death, rashes on their body and udders, alopecia, loss of skin pigmentation, allergic skin reactions, dermatitis, diarrhoea, anorexia and pruritus [17]. Several control methods (chemical, biological, mechanical and integrated) are being used and most of the methods are not successful due to rapid re-infestation of the plant [18]. Earthworms are universally employed as an ecosystem indicator species in ecotoxicological studies on soil contaminants [19-21]. Earthworms are sensitive, readily available and easy to handle, and chronological data are existing from their use in toxicity investigations [22]. Environmental conditions greatly affect their vital processes and the diversity of living organisms [23]. Biochemical responses in organisms against environmental stress are regarded as early warning indices of pollution in the environment. Antioxidant enzymes protect the cells from various reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hence considered as biomarkers for assessing the environmental impact of contaminants. Enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione S-transferase (GST), as well as lipid peroxidation (LPO) [24-28] have been studied as biomarkers of environmental pollution. There is lack of data on biochemical responses in E. fetida by P. hysterophorus and fly ash.

Therefore, the aim of the present study was to understand the biological effects of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the earthworm, Eisenia fetida and to provide additional information on their toxicological effects.

Materials and methods

Collection of Cow dung

Cow dung was obtained from nearby village.

Collection of Fly ash

Fly ash was procured from a thermal power plant, Rajpura.

Collection of P. hysterophorus

Parthenium hysterophorus was collected from fallow lands of Patiala.

Procurement of Earthworms

The earthworms (Eisenia fetida) were obtained from Punjab State Council for Science and Technology, Chandigarh.

Experimental Setup

The experiments were conducted in plastic trays, each with a capacity of 1 kg, with a hole at the bottom. The cow dung, fly ash and P.hysterophorus were mixed in different ratios as a bedding material:

Cow dung: Fly ash - 60:40 Cow dung: P.hysterophorus - 75:25 Total four plastic trays were taken. Thirty healthy earthworms were introduced in plastic trays; water was sprinkled daily on the trays using sprayer to maintain the moisture level of 55-60%. The plastic trays were kept under shade and covered with the gunny bags to avoid direct sunlight.

Biochemical Analysis

Eight earthworms were removed from each group at the interval of 15, 30, 45 and 60 days of exposure, rinsed with distilled water and kept for 48h on moist filter paper in petridishes to depurate their gut content. The earthworms were homogenized in potassium phosphate buffer (0.1M) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at o 4 C. The enzyme assays were performed using dual beam UV-visible spectrophotometer from Labtronics (LT- 2900).

Lipid peroxidation was measured as malondialdehyde (MDA) a thiobarbutaric acid reacting substance, using the method of Wilbur [29]. The reaction mixture contained 0.8 M HCl, 12.5% TCA and 1.23% TBA. The mixture was incubated for 15 minutes at 90℃, after cooling, reaction was measured at 530nm. Values are expressed in −1 μmol mg protein using extinction coefficient of 1.56 × 5 -2 -1 10 cm mol .

SOD activity was determined as described by Das [30] in a reaction mixture containing phosphate buffer ( pH 7.4), 20 mM α-methionine, 100mM hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 50μ M EDTA, 1% triton X- 100, 100μM riboflavin, 0.1% napthylethylene diamine (NED),1.0% sulphanilamide, 5% orthophosphoric acid and 100μl sample. The activity was measured at 543nm.

Catalase (CAT) was estimated by the method of Aebi [31]. The reaction mixture contained 0.1mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 30 M H2O2 and 50μl sample. The rate of decomposition of H2O2 was measured at 240nm. GPx activity was measured as described by Rotruck [32]. The reaction mixture contained 0.4 M Tris buffer (pH 7.0),10 mM sodium azide, 2.5 mM hydrogen peroxide, 4mM reduced glutathione, 10% TCA, 0.3M Phosphate solution, 4mM EDTA, 0.04% Ellman's reagent, 1mM reduced glutathione and 100 μl sample. The activity of glutathione was measured at 420nm.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed by Student’s t-test using graph pad and considering p<0.001 as significant and p>0.05as non significant.

Results and discussion

Results

The effects of fly ash and P. hysterophorus on the biochemical responses of E. fetida during vermicom posting are shown in Figure 1, 2, 3 and 4. The MDA level showed significant increase at 15, 30, 45 and 60 day as compared to control in fly ash groups. In P. hysterophorus treated groups, the same trend was observed i.e. increased MDA level at all intervals in comparison to control.

The SOD activity significantly increased at 15 and 30 day, while the level of SOD was decreased at 45 and 60 day in fly ash and P. hysterophorus treated groups as compared to control.

The activities of CAT showed significant elevation at 15 and 30 day, while significant reduction was observed at 45 and 60 day in fly ash treated groups as compared to control. On exposure to P. hysterophorus, the same trend was observed i.e. significant increase at 15 and 30 day exposure, while decline in activity of CAT was observed at 45 and 60 day in comparison to control.

A significant increase in Gpx activity was observed on 15 and 30 day, while a significant decrease was noted on 45 and 60 day as compared to control in fly ash and P.

Figure 1. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the MDA content of E. fetida.
Figure 1. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the MDA content of E. fetida.
Figure 2. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the SOD activity of E. fetida.
Figure 2. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the SOD activity of E. fetida.
Figure3. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the CAT activity of E. fetida.
Figure3. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the CAT activity of E. fetida.
Figure 4. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the Gpx activity of E. fetida.
Figure 4. Effect of fly ash and P.hysterophorus on the Gpx activity of E. fetida.

Discussion

Biological molecular markers are regarded as fast, diagnostic and prognostic early warning system to detect and assess the environmental impact of wide range of contaminants, which cannot be achieved from chemical analysis of environmental samples [26, 33, 34].

Various contaminants like metals are known to induce lipid peroxidation through the formation of ROS and earthworms are particularly susceptible to peroxidation of lipids due to high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids [35, 36]. The MDA is an oxidized product of cellular lipid membranes and could be used as a sensitive biomarker of cell injury [23, 36]. In the present study, MDA levels were found to be increased in E.fetida after exposure to fly ash and P.hysterophorus at all intervals, indicating the formation of ROS. These results are in confirmation with the findings of Saint-Denis [36] and Ferreira-Cravo [28] who exposed Eisenia fetida andrei and polychaeta Laenereis acuta to Pb and Cu. Similar results were reported in Dichogaster curgensis exposed to fly ash [5].

The enzyme activities varied with duration of exposure. Superoxide dismutase catalyzes dismutation of superoxide anion into O and H O [26]. It is a primary 2 2 2 2- remover of O radical and can play an important role in defending against accumulation of toxic activated oxygen species (AOS). The enhanced SOD activity resulted in increased H O [37]. In present study, SOD activity 2 2 showed elevation at day 15 and 30 as compared to control indicated that the earthworms exposed to fly ash and - P.hysterophorus may induce the formation of O2 that resulted in the synthesis of superoxide dismutase to protect the cells from oxidant damage [38]. These results are in accordance with the findings of the study done by Łaszczyca [27] in which the earthworms were exposed to heavy metal contaminated soils. The SOD activity was decreased on day 45 and 60 in fly ash and P.hysterophorus treated groups. This may be due to the SOD by singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide and peroxyl radicals [39-44].

Catalase protects the cells by eliminating H O [26]. In 2 2 the present study, the catalase activity showed significant elevation at day 15 and 30 while significant reduction was observed at 45 and 60 day when treated with fly ash and P.hysterophorus The changes in catalase activity were consistent with the activity of superoxide dismutase. The catalase elevated activity at 15 and 30 day of treatment is may be due to increase in the substrate concentration produced to maintain the hydrogen peroxide level [45]. Thus, an elevation in catalase activity may be an indicator to the oxidative stress [46]. The reason for the reduction of CAT activity at 45 and 60 day exposure might be due high cellular stress or the presence of high levels of ROS [47]. Ribera [39] used CAT as a biomarker for the study of biochemical responses in earthworm (E. fetida andrei) exposed to carbaryl.

Glutathione peroxidase eliminates H O by using reduced 2 2 glutathione as a hydrogen donor, while glutathione reductase reduces oxidized glutathione to maintain the cellular antioxidant status. The increase in GPx activity may be a compensatory mechanism between GPx and GR [27] or NADPH availability and/or inactivation of GR by binding of metals to biomolecules [37]. The GPx activity was found to be increased at 15 and 30 day in fly ash and P.hysterophorus treated groups might be due to the increased demand for organism to manage peroxidative damage by reducing the level of peroxides [48]. The reduced GPx activity at 45 and 60 day may be due to some detoxification and phenotypic adaptive mechanisms [49].

Conclusion

The study reports on the effects of fly ash and P. hysterophorus on the antioxidant status of earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Toxicological effects of fly ash and parthenium weed on E. fetida were assessed by using biomarkers. During management and risk assessment of fly ash and parthenium weed it was found that fly ash and parthenium induces harmful effects such as oxidative stress to earthworm E. fetida. Therefore, use of fly ash as soil amendment and P. hysterophorus as feed may lead to harmful environmental hazards.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the facilities provided by Department of Zoology and Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala to pursue the research work. Also, the financial aid extended by UGC in the form of Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship for minority students is greatly appreciated.

References

References

  1. Elvira C, Dominguez J, Sampedro L and Mato S: Vermicomposting for the paper-pulp industry. Biocycle 1995; 36 (6): 62–63.
  2. Edwards CA and Bater JE: The use of earthworm in environmental management. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1992; 24: 1683–1689.
  3. Sarojini S, Annanthakrishnasamy G, Manimegala G, Prakash M and Gunasekaran G: Effect of lignite fly ash on the growth and reproduction of Earthworm Eisenia fetida. E- Journal of Chemistry 2009; 6(2): 511-
  4. Yao ZT, Ji XS, Sarker PK, Tang JH, Ge LQ, Xia MS and Xi YQ: A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth Science Reviews 2015; 141: 105–121.
  5. Markad VL, Kodam KM and Ghole VS: Effect of fly ash on biochemical responses and DNA damage in earthworm Dichogaster curgensis. Journal of Hazardous Material 2012; 215–216: 191–198.
  6. Maity S, Bhattacharya S and Chaudhury S: Metallothione in response in earthworms Lampito mauritii (Kinberg) exposed to fly ash. Chemosphere 2009; 77: 319–324.
  7. Pandey VC, Singh JS, Singh RP, Singh N and Yunus M: Arsenic hazards in coal fly ash and its fate in Indian scenario. Resources Conservation Recycling 2011; 55:819–835.
  8. Pandey VC and Singh N: Impact of fly ash in corporation in soil systems. Agricultute Ecosystem and Environment 2010; 136:16–27.
  9. Dragović S, Ćujić M, Slavković - Beškoski L, Gajić B, Bajat B, Kilibarda M and Onjia A: Trace element distribution in surface soils from a coal burning power production area: a case study from the largest power plant site in Serbia. Catena 2013; 104: 288–296.
  10. Mandal A and Sengupta D: An assessment of soil contamination due to heavy metals around a coal fired thermal power plant in India. Environmental Geology 2006; 51: 409–420.
  11. Grumiaux F, Demuynck S, Schikorski D, Lemière S and Leprêtre A: Assessing the effects of FBC ash treatments of metal contaminated soils using life history traits and metal bioaccumulation analysis of earthworm Eisenia andrei. Chemosphere 2010; 79: 156–161.
  12. Chakraborty R and Mukherjee A: Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of coal fly ash water leachate. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2009; 72: 838–842.
  13. Ali M, Parvez S, Pandey S, Atif F, Kaur M, Rehman H and Raisuddin S: Fly ash leachate induces oxidative stress in freshwater fish Channa punctata (Bloch). Environment International 2004; 30: 993–998.
  14. Callaway RM and Ridenour WM: Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2004; 2(8): 436-443.
  15. Kapoor RT: Awareness related survey of an invasive alien weed, Parthenium hysterophorus L. in Gautam Budh Nagar district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Agricultural Technology 2012; 8(3): 1129- 1140.
  16. Wiesner M, Taye T, Hoffmann A, Wilfried P, Buettner P, Buettner C, Mewis J and Ulrichs C: Impact of the pan-tropical weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. on human health in Ethiopia, Utilization of diversity in land use systems: Sustainable and organic approaches to meethuman needs., Tropentag, Witzenhausen 2007.
  17. Bezuneh TT: Phytochemistry and antimicrobial activity of Parthenium hysterophorus L.: a review. Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2015; 3(3):30–38.
  18. Yadav A and Garg VK: Vermiconversion of biogas plant slurry and parthenium weed mixture to manure. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 2016; 5:301-309.
  19. Reinecke SA and Reinecke AJ: The Comet assay as biomarker of heavy metal genotoxicity in earthworms. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2004; 46:208–215.
  20. Langdon CJ, Piearce TG, Meharg AA and Semple KT: Survival and behavior of the earthworms Lumbricus rubellus and Dendrodrilus rubidus from arsenate contaminated and non-contaminated sites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2001; 33:1239–1244.
  21. Marino F and Morgan AJ: The time-course of metal (Ca, Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn) accumulation from a contaminated soil by three populations of the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus. Applied Soil Ecology 1999; 12:169–177.
  22. OECD. Guideline for testing of chemicals: In: Earthworm acute toxicity tests, No. 207. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.1984.
  23. Eida MF, Matter IA and Zaher FHA: Isolation and Characterization of cellulose and hemicellulolytic fungi from salt affected soils and compost. Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences 2016; 3(4): 164-170.
  24. Livingstone DR, Garcia-Martinez P, Michel X , Narbonne JF, O’Hara S, Ribera D and Winston G: Oxyradical production as a pollution-mediated mechanism of toxicity in the common mussel Mytilus edulis and other mollusks. Functional Ecology 1990; 4: 415–424.
  25. Dallinger R: Strategies of metal detoxification in terrestrial invertebrates: In: Dallinger R, Rainbow PS (eds) Ecotoxicology of metals in invertebrates. Lewis Publishers, London. 1993; 246–281.
  26. Saint-Denis M, Labrot F, Narbonne JF and Ribera D: Glutathione, glutathione related enzymes, and catalase in the earthworm Eisenia fetida Andrei. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 1998; 35:602–614.
  27. Łaszczyca P, Augustyniak M, Babczyń ska A, Bednarska K, Kafel A, Migula P, Wilczek G and Witas L: Profiles of enzymatic activity in earthworms from zinc lead and cadmium polluted areas near Olkusz (Poland). Environmental International 2004; 30: 901–910.
  28. Ferreira-Cravo M, Ventura-Lima J, Sandrini JZ, Amado LL, Geracitano LA, Rebelo M, Bianchini A and Monserrat JM: Antioxidant responses in different body regions of the polychaeta Laeonereis acuta (Nereididae) exposed to copper. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2009; 72: 388–393.
  29. Wilbur KM, Bernheim F and Shapiro OW: The thiobarbituric acid reagent as a test for the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acid by various agents. Acta Biochemistry and Biophysics 1949; 24: 305-313.
  30. Das K, Samanta L and Chainy GBN: A modified spectrophotometric assay for superoxide dismutase using nitrite formation by superoxide radicals. Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics 2000; 37: 201-
  31. Aebi H.E: Catalase. In: Methods of enzymatic analysis. Bergmeyr.H.U.(ed.).Verlag Chemie. Weinheim 1983; 3: 273-286.
  32. Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther HE, Swanson AB, Hafeman DG and Hoekstra WG: Selenium: biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidise. Science 1973; 179: 588-590.
  33. Lourenco JI, Pereira RO, Silva AC, Morgado JM, Carvalho FP, Oliveira JM, Malta MP, Paiva AA, Mendo SA and Goncalves FJ:Genotoxic endpoints in the earthworms/sub-lethal assay to evaluate natural soils contaminated by metals and radionuclides. Journal of Hazardous Material 2011; 186:788–795.
  34. Livingstone DR: Review biotechnology and pollution monitoring: use of molecular biomarkers in the aquatic environment. Journal of Chemistry Technology and Biotechnology 1993; 57:195–211.
  35. Krauss M, Wilcke W and Zech W: Availability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to earthworms in urban soils. Environmental Science and Technology 2000; 34: 4335–4340.
  36. Saint-Denis M, Narbonne JF, Arnaud C and Ribera D: Biochemical responses of the earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei exposed to contaminated artificial soil: effects of lead acetate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2001; 33:395–404.
  37. Lin D, Zhou Q, Xie X and Liu Y: Potential biochemical and genetic toxicity of triclosan as an emerging pollutant on earthworms (Eisenia fetida).Chemosphere 2010; 18:1328-1333.
  38. Zhang W, Zhang M, An S, Xiong B, Li H, Cui CZ and Lin KF: Ecotoxicological effects of decabromodiphenyl ether and cadmium contamination on soil microbes and enzymes. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2012; 82:71-79.
  39. Hodgson E K and Fridovich I: The interaction of bovine erythrocyte superoxide dismutase with hydrogen peroxide: inactivation of the enzyme. Biochemistry 1975; 14: 5294–5299.
  40. Escobar JA, Rubio MA and Lissi EA: SOD and catalase inactivation by singlet oxygen and peroxyl radicals. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 1996; 20:285–290.
  41. Ribera D, Narbonne JF, Arnaud C and Saint-Denis M: Biochemical responses of the earthworm Eisenia fetida andrei exposed to contaminated artificial soil, effects of carbaryl. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2001; 33:1123–1130.
  42. Company R, Serafim A, Bebianno MJ, Cosson R, Shillito B and FialaMedioni A: Effect of cadmium, copper and mercury on antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation in the gills of the hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus azoricus. Marine Environmental Research 2004; 58:377–381.
  43. Fatima M, Mandiki SNM, Douxfils J, Silvestre, F, Coppe P and Kestemont P: Combined effects of herbicides on biomarkers reflecting immune-endocrine interactions in goldfish immune and antioxidant effects. Aquatic Toxicology 2007; 81:159–167.
  44. Sandrini JZ, Lima JV, Regoli F, Fattorini D, Notti A, Marins LF, Monserrat JM and Kapoor RT: Antioxidant responses in the nereidid Laeonereis acuta (Annelida, Polychaeta) after cadmium exposure. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2008; 70:115–120.
  45. Liu S, Zhou Q X, and Wang Y Y: Ecotoxicological responses of the earthworm Eisenia fetida exposed to soil contaminated with HHCB. 2011; Chemosphere 83:1080–86.
  46. Yang X, Yufang S, Ackland ML, Yang L and Xiufeng C: Biochemical Responses of Earthworm Eisenia fetida Exposed to CadmiumContaminated Soil with Long Duration. Bulletine of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2012; 89:1148–1153.
  47. Rajiv P, Rajeshwari S and Venckatesh R: Impact of Parthenium weeds on earthworms (Eudrilus eugeniae) during vermicomposting. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2014; 21:12364-12371.
  48. Elumalai M, Antunes C and Guillhermino L: Enzymatic biomarkers in the crab Carcinus maenas from Minho River estuary (NW Portugal) exposed to zinc and mercury. Chemosphere 2007; 66(7): 1249–1255.
  49. Posthuma L and Van Straalen M.M: Heavy metal adaptation in terrestrial invertebrates: a review of occurrence, genetics, physiology and ecological consequences. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology C 1993; 100:11-38.