Journal of Innovations in Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences (JIPBS)
eISSN: 2349-2759 | pISSN: 2395-1095 | Vol. 5, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 86-91

Bioactivities of Moringa oleifera leaf powder towards the cowpea beetle Callosobruchus maculatus F. under laboratory conditions

Nadia Z. Dimetry1, Huda El-Behery1

1Department of Pests and Plant Protection, National Research Centre El-Buhouth St., Dokki, Cairo, Egypt, Postal Code 12622
DOI: 10.56511/JIPBS.2018.v5.i01.pp86-91 | Published: 2018-01-05 | Article page and PDF

Abstract

Potency of Moringa oleifera leaf powder was tested against the cowpea beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) in a choice and non-choice tests. The insecticidal and the biological efficacy were tested against the adult bruchid stage. Orientation of the adult beetles towards cowpea seeds treated with moringa leaf powder is tested at different concentrations. The results obtained show that in the choice test, the adult beetles after one day preferred to stay in the control. After 3 and 6 days from treatment, adults could not discriminate between the treated and control seeds for orientation. On counting the number of eggs laid on cowpea seeds, it was found that as the concentration of leaf powder on the seeds increased, the number of eggs laid increased. In non-choice experiment, mortality of C. maculatus increased significantly as the concentration of moringa leaf powder decreased to 0.1 gm. The total number of eggs laid decreased significantly as the concentration of moringa leaf powder decreased. On the contrary, at the highest concentration of moringa leaf powder, the number of eggs increased to 52.25±9.12 compared with 59.0±3.78 for the control. On calculating the percentage of egg oviposition deterrency, 0.1gm resulted in high percentage deterrence 95.76 % compared with 11.44 % on using 1.0 gm. Also, the percentage of adult emergence increased as the concentration of leaf powder increased. The foregoing results laid to the conclusion that Moringa leaf powder at the lowest concentration tested could be successfully used for the control of cowpea beetle under storage conditions.

Keywords: Moringa oleifera; Callosobruchus maculatus adults; insecticidal efficacy; biological efficacy; oviposition deterrency

Introduction

Moringa tree (Moringa oleifera) (Family Moringaceae) is native to India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. It is also cultivated in Egypt. Moringa leaves, seeds, flowers and roots are used in different medicinal treatments. Oil that has been extracted from moringa seeds is used in Agriculture, foods, perfume and hair care [1]. Different parts of this tree contain a profile of various important minerals and are a good source of proteins, vitamin A, B, C, D & E and minerals which include potassium, calcium, iron, selenium and magnesium and various poly phenolic compounds [2] (Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en. Wikipedia, org [3-5]. According to Madukwe et al., (2012) [6] moringa leaves are completely safe for consumption and have no negative effect or toxic elements. The leaves are also rich source of essential amino acids such as methionine, cystine, tryptophan and lysine with a high content of proteins [7]. Moringa leaves are a good source of natural antioxidants [8]. In spite of all the benefit uses of moringa leaves, its effect in pest control is meager and scanty, with the exception of the work of Butani and Verma (1981) [9] who recorded different pests attacking drumsticks tree and it is also used for pest control [10-11]. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) always suffer postharvest losses both in the field and under the storage conditions after harvest [12-13]. Reduction in the yield caused by insect pests can reach as high as 95 % if not controlled and depends on location, year and cultivar [14]. Several species of bruchids have been mentioned as pests of cowpea [15]. Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius is the most serious pest of stored cowpea crop "V. unguiculata (L.) Walp in Egypt and throughout the tropics [16, 10]. Infestation often occurs in the field when pods are near maturity. After the crop is harvested, the bruchids multiply and do considerable damage to stored cowpeas [17].

The use of synthetic chemicals in pest control is the cause of much concern owing to the undesirable side effect emanating from their uses [18]. Also, they are expensive, polluting and potentially dangerous. Their repeated uses for several decades has disrupted biological control system by natural enemies and led to outbreaks of secondary insect pests. Insecticides especially the dust and gaseous forms of methyl bromide and phostoxin are recommended for storage. Methyl bromide is prohibited and phostotoxic a fumigant that kill humans and animals [19]. Fumigation is the most effective method in insect pest elimination in stored products. Currently phosphine and methyl bromide are the two common fumigants used for stored product protection world over. However, because of its ozone depletion potential, methyl bromide is being phased out completely [20]. Therefore, it is very important to search for safe, cheap and effective method of pest control. Green plants and their extracts, also essential oils extracted from plants are safe alternative for pest control which are mammalian non toxic and easily biodegradable in comparison to chemical pesticides. The use of moringa for controlling insect pests during storage has not been studied in Egypt according to the best of our knowledge. The objective of the present study is directed towards evaluating repellency, insecticidal and biological efficacy of moringa leaf powder for the control of the cowpea beetle in choice and non choice tests under laboratory conditions.

Experimental

Materials and methods

Insect colony

The cowpea beetle, "C. maculatus (F.) was reared under laboratory conditions ( 27±2ºC. and 65- 75 % R.H. and a photoperiod of 16: 8 L :D for several generations on cowpea seeds in glass containers of 1 liter capacity, each containing about 200 gm of cowpea seeds and covered with muslin. Cowpea seeds were heated in an oven at 65 - 75ºC for five hours to kill the microorganisms or any other form of pests before starting any experiment.

M. oleifera leaves were kindly obtained from Prof. Dr. Abou El Fetoh Prof. at Technology and Horticulture Crop Department, NRC, Cairo, Egypt. The leaves were washed thoroughly and left to dry under laboratory conditions. The leaves were crushed and grinded completely to be fine powder

Choice experiments

A glass arena (3.5cm high X 21.0 cm. in diameter) was divided into two equal parts by using hard card board sheet put inside the arena with an opening in the middle to give free movement for the adult beetles to choose the proper part of the Petri dish to rest and laid eggs according to Jermy (1966) [21] and Dimetry et al. (2017) [22] with some modifications. Equal quantities (10 gm) of clean cowpea seeds without any treatment as well as 10 gm cowpea seeds mixed thoroughly with moringa leaf powder were put each in each side of the arena using different concentrations of moringa leaf powder. The whole experiment lasted 6 days and the concentrations of the powder used are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 gm. To assess the preference of adults, two pairs of C. maculatus about 1–2 days old were put in the centre of each arena and given the choice between the two different parts either treated seeds or clean seeds without any treatment. The orientation preference of the adult beetles was recorded after 1, 3 and 6 days. If the adult was not recorded on the non choice and was not selected in determining the preference. Four replicates were done for each concentration. The data obtained determined the relative percentage repellency and it was calculated according to Nerio et al. [23].

% repellency according to Nerio et al. [23].

PR = (NC - NT / NC+ NT) X 100 Where NC= the number of adults on the control (not treated seeds after exposure interval) Nt= the number of adults of treated seeds after exposure interval Also, the number of dead insects was recorded in each partition of the Petri dish. After seven days, all the beetles were removed and discarded and the number of deposited eggs on treated and untreated seeds was recorded and followed up till the emergence of the adults from infested seeds.

Non- choice test

Pesticidal efficacy

To test the toxicity of the different concentrations of moringa leaf powder, newly emerged ten adult beetles were placed into a glass cup 120 ml with 10 gm cowpea seeds each mixed thoroughly with the tested concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5 gm.) Another group of beetles were placed into a glass cup 120ml together with 10 gm of cowpea seeds free from any treatments. The mortality of adults were recorded after 72 hours and corrected according to Abbott’s formula (1925) [24]. The LC50 was calculated through probit analysis after Finney (1971) [25].

Biological efficacy

Newly emerged C. maculatus beetles (male and female) were placed into a cup 120 ml. with 10 gm cowpea seeds mixed thoroughly with the different tested concentrations separately. Total number of eggs laid was counted daily till seven days. The laid eggs were separated and incubated under the previously mentioned conditions until the emergence of the adults from the infested seeds. The percentage of adult emergence was recorded at the different concentrations of moringa leaf powder used and compared with that of the control without any treatment. The percentage of deterrence of egg deposition was calculated according to the formula of Lwande et al. [26]. D= (1 –T/C) X 100) where T and C represent the mean number of deposited eggs per female of the treated and control individuals. Four replicates were done for each concentration.

Statistical analysis

Abbott’s formula [24] was carried out to correct the percentage of mortality. Data were subjected to analysis means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. Analysis of T-test was applied through the SPSS Computer program to discriminate between treatments and/or control. The LC values were calculated according to Finney (1971) [25].

Results and discussion

Choice test

The results obtained in Table 1 show that C. maculatus adults can’t discriminate between treated and untreated seeds after the different periods studied 3 & 6 days for the different concentrations of moringa leaf powder. However, at the concentrations of 0.1gm moringa leaf powder, the beetles preferred to settle on the control seeds where 40 beetles were directed to the control seeds one day after treatments and only 24 adults settled in the treated section. After 3 days more than 50 % of the adult beetles were directed to the treated cowpea seeds. After 6 days, the beetles could not discriminate between treated or control seeds where nearly equal number of the beetles was found in the two sections of the arena (Table 2). This may be due to the presence of different nutritive substances like amino acids, anti-oxidants and many vitamins in the dried moringa leaf powder and also may be due to the variation of seed texture owing to the presence of moringa powder covering the treated seeds. On calculating the percentage of repellence of the adult bruchid beetles towards the treated seeds, the adults show very low percentage of repellency (7%) after the sixth day from seed treatments. After the third day from seed treatment, no repellency was present and the adults could not discriminate between treated and control seeds. After the first day from treatment only 25 % of the adults were repelled from treated seeds.

Concerning the mean number of eggs laid per two females on the different seeds either treated with the different concentrations of moringa leaf powder or control seeds without treatment, maximum number of eggs were found on seeds treated with the highest concentration of leaf powder ( 0.5gm) 32 eggs compared with 14.75 eggs on using 0.1 gm leaf powder (Figure 1). However, comparing the number of eggs laid in the

Table 1. Distribution of Callosobruchus maculatus adults in treated and control sections under laboratory conditions ᴏ (28±0.5 C., 70 – 75% R. H. & 16: 8 L:D Photoperiod).
Table 1. Distribution of Callosobruchus maculatus adults in treated and control sections under laboratory conditions ᴏ (28±0.5 C., 70 – 75% R. H. & 16: 8 L:D Photoperiod).

treated section of the arena and the control section seeds without treatment the results show great reduction in the number eggs in the treated section for all the concentrations used compared with control section. This is to ascertain the previous data about the orientation of the adults. From the foregoing results, it could be concluded that decreasing the concentration of leaf powder to 0.1gm proof to be the least suitable for laying eggs in comparison to the biggest concentration of moringa leaf powder (0.5 gm) were found to be the most suitable to lay eggs on. The present findings are in agreement with Madukwe et al., ( 2012) [6] who reported that moringa leaves are completely safe for consumption and have no known negative side effects or toxic elements. This statement clarifies why C. maculatus adults prefer to settle on cowpea seeds treated with the highest concentration (0.5gm) of moringa leaf powder covering cowpea seeds. Again, the texture of the cowpea seeds covered with the biggest concentration of moringa leaf powder may be a preferable surface for the adults to lay their eggs on.

Using different concentrations of Moringa leaf powder mixed thoroughly with cowpea seeds, the female beetles lay eggs normally on these seeds and as the concentration of the leaf powder increased on the seeds, C. maculatus female laid eggs normally on these seeds. On increasing the concentration of moringa leaf powder gives significant protein against oxidative damage molecules and increasing the concentration of moringa leaf powder to 0.5gm, the female bruchid laid the biggest number of eggs (32 eggs) compared with 14.75 eggs only on using 0.1 gm leaf powder of moringa. The leaves of M. oleifera have been reported by Loebel (2002) [27] to demonstrate antioxidant activity due to its high amount of poly phenols. It prevents oxidative damage to major biomolecules and gives significant protein against oxidative damage. This explains why the cowpea beetle laid maximum number of eggs on using the highest concentration of moringa leaf powder (0.5 gm /10 gm seeds). The results of the present findings are in agreement with Shazal (1990) [28] who stated that the relationship between pest number and damage is necessary as bases for pest management.

C. maculatus in treated and control sections of the arena.

Table 2. Total orientation of adult beetles Adults after one day

T C Live 19 39 Dead 5 1 Total 24 40

Figure 1. Mean Number of deposited eggs per two females
Figure 1. Mean Number of deposited eggs per two females

Non- choice test

The pesticidal activity

The results obtained in Table (3) show that the mortality of C. maculatus adults was maximum 93.33% after exposure period of 72 hours on using cowpea seeds treated with the lowest concentration of moringa leaf powder (0.05). This data are in consistent with Joana and Daniel (2010) [29] who concluded that pure neem oil, mixture of neem and moringa oils could be used for the preservation of cowpea. However, if only moringa oil is to be used, the concentration should not be less than 1.5 ml/ 200 gm cowpea. Increasing the concentration of leaf powder to 1% decreased the mortality of the adults to 61.59 %. The mortality of the beetles on the control seeds was 7.77 %.

All the data obtained are statistically significant.

Susceptibility to insecticides may vary in different arthropod species as a result of physiological selectivity.

This type of selectivity is rare and derives from excretion mechanisms, detoxification processes, penetration, rates or variations in enzymes that are inhibited by the active ingredients of an insecticide [30]. The difference in the susceptibility is likely to be based on mobility. C.

maculatus adults were mobile and showed an active searching behavior when they were exposed to plant surfaces, thus they came into contact with the lower doses of insecticide residue than the relatively static.

After 3 day after 6 day

T C T C 11 15 7 6 19 13 5 8 30 28 12 14 -3.45 7.69

Table 3. Mortality % of adult beetles C. maculatus on using different concentrations of M. oleifera leaf powder under laboratory conditions.
Table 3. Mortality % of adult beetles C. maculatus on using different concentrations of M. oleifera leaf powder under laboratory conditions.

Means in a Colum followed with the same letter(s) are insignificantly different at 5% level of probability Based on LD50 values, the data obtained in Table (4) show that LD50 increased to 2.54 gm compared with 0.05 gm responsible for LD90 values So moringa leaf powder at the highest dose used (0.5gm/10 gm cowpea seeds) acted as attractant for C. maculatus adults to lay eggs on and could not be used as an insecticide. The foregoing results are in agreement with the data mentioned by Adenekan et al., (2013) [11] who stated that M. Oleifera leaf and stem powder recorded 85 and 70 % insect mortality

Table 4. LD50 and LD90 of M. oleifera leaf powder for C. maculatus adults after 72 hours from treatment.
Table 4. LD50 and LD90 of M. oleifera leaf powder for C. maculatus adults after 72 hours from treatment.

The results obtained in Table (5) show that the different biological aspects of C. maculatus adults given treated cowpea seeds with moringa leaf powder at different concentrations were greatly affected. The highest number of eggs laid was on cowpea seeds treated with 1% concentration which was insignificant in comparison with the control seeds without any treatment. This results may resistance to bruchid. Owusu-Akyaw [31] agreed with the present findings and stated that cowpea variety with a tough pod wall suffered the least damage. Also, Adjadi et al., [32] reported that two recessive genes are required in the homozygous conditions to give resistance to bruchid. On the other hand, cowpea seeds treated with the lowest concentration of moringa leaf powder, there was a sharp reduction in egg deposition and the adults laid the least number of eggs (2.5) compared with 59 eggs for the control. This means that the number of eggs laid increased significantly as the concentration of moringa leaf powder increased. The preference for egg deposition of the cowpea beetle could be arranged in a descending order as follows: Control > 1 > 0.5 > 0.3 > 0.1 % concentration. This condition can be explained by the fact that using the lowest concentration of moringa leaf powder caused deterrence of the females to lay eggs on. These results are in accordance with that reported by Lopez et al. (2008) [33] who stated that moringa leaf powder exhibited volatile toxicity to C. maculatus beetles. On the other hand, highest concentration of moringa leaf powder attracted the female bruchid to lay eggs. The percentage of deterrence of egg deposition show that the least concentration used (0.1) gave the highest percentage deterrence for the adults to lay eggs (95.8 %) compared with the least percentage of deterrence on using the highest concentration of moringa leaf powder (1%) where the percentage repellency was 11.44 % only. The present findings were in agreement with Eleirt et al., (1980) and Madukwe (2012) [34, 6] who pointed out that M. oleifera can be used as biopesticide and moringa leaves are completely safe for consumption and have no known negative side effect or toxic elements.

Table 5. Effect of different concentrations of M. oleifera leaf powder covering cowpea seeds on oviposition of adult beetles under laboratory conditions.
Table 5. Effect of different concentrations of M. oleifera leaf powder covering cowpea seeds on oviposition of adult beetles under laboratory conditions.

Means in a Colum followed with the same letter(s) are insignificantly different at 5% level of probability The Percentage of adult emergence (Table 6) increased as the percentage of moringa leaf powder increased. This result may be due to the fact that hatched larvae inside the treated seeds fed regularly and benefit from the nutritive substances from vitamins and amino acids present in moringa leaf powder. These results are in agreement with Loebel, 2002 [24] who stated that moringa tree has indigenous source of highly digestible protein, calcium, iron, vitamin C and carotenoids.

Table 6. Effect of different concentrations of M. oleifera leaf powder on the percentage of emergence of C. maculatus adults under laboratory conditions.
Table 6. Effect of different concentrations of M. oleifera leaf powder on the percentage of emergence of C. maculatus adults under laboratory conditions.

On using cowpea seeds treated with moringa leaf powder at 0.1gm, the percentage of adult emergence decreased and reached the lowest value compared with the control seeds. In this case, the nutritive substance present in moringa leaf powder is not sufficient for the development of the larvae inside the seed and the secondary plant substances present in the powder act as botanical insecticide and this is responsible for the less percentage of adult emergence compared with the control.

Conclusion

Using different concentrations of moringa leaf powder as a botanic insecticide for the control of C. maculatus adult under the laboratory conditions show that very low concentrations between 0.05 and 0.1 gm / 10 gm cowpea seeds were efficient to decrease the number of eggs laid as well as decreasing the percentage of adult emergence in the next generation. This is in accordance with Isman (2000) [35] who stated that botanicals have wide range of bioactivity and possess contact and fumigant toxicity and repellent oviposition and feeding deterrence. Accordingly, it can be used successfully in IPM program.

Acknowledgment

Sincere thanks and deep appreciation are due to Prof. Dr. Aboelfetoh M. Abdalla, Professor at Technology of Horticulture Crops Department, and the head of Egyptian Scientific Association for Moringa. National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt for his valuable help and offering the Team workers with Moringa leaves. Grateful acknowledgment is expressed to the National Research Centre for all the facilities during this work.

References

References

  1. Foidl N, Makkar HPS and Becker K: The potential of M. oleifera for agricultural and industrial uses In: (ed. Lowell J. Fuglie) The miracle tree: The multiple attribute of moringa ( ed.). 2001; 45–76.
  2. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, en. Wikipedia.org Moringa vitamins
  3. Price ML.Vegetables from the tree! ECHO News 1986; 8(4), 1-2.
  4. Sontag VOV. In Analytical Methods in Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products. 1982; 440-441.
  5. Anwar F and Rashid U: Physico-chemical characteristics of Moringa Oleifera seeds and seed oil from a wild provenance of Pakistan Pak. J. Bot. 2007; 39(5): 1443-1453.
  6. Madukwe DK, Onuh MO, Christo IE: Effects of Moringa oleifera leaf extract on the growth and yield of soybean ( Glucine max L. Merri and sweet pepper Capsicum annum L.) Int. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2012; 1 (3): 90-97.
  7. Metha LK, Balaraman R, Amin AH, Bafina PA and Gulati OD: Effect of fruit of Moringa oleifera on the lipid profile of normal and hypercholesterolemic rabbits. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2003; 86: 191-195.
  8. Rajanandh MG and Kavitha J: Quantitative Estimation of β -Sitosterol, Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Compounds in the leaves of Moringa oleifera. Int. J. of Pharm Tech Res. 2010; 2(2): 1409-1414.
  9. Butani DK and Verma S: Pesticides. Insect pests of vegetable and their control. Drumsticks, Pesticides1981; 15: 29-31.
  10. Dimetry NZ, El-Gengaihi S, and Abd El-Salam, AME: Protection of stored cowpea from Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) attack by some plant extract formulations in different storage sacks. Herba Polonica 2007; 53(1):71-84.
  11. Adenekan MO, OKpeze VE, Ogundipe WF and Oguntade, MI: Evaluation of Moringa oleifera powders for the control of bruchid beetles during storage. Int. J. of Agric. Policy & Research 2013; 1(10): 305-310.
  12. Faleiro J R, Singh KM: Yield infestation studies associated with insects infesting cowpea (Vigna unguiculata ((L.)Walp) in Delhi. Indian J. Entomol.1985; 47: 287 – 291.
  13. Mariga IK, Giga GP, Marramba P: Cow pea production constraints and research in Zimbabwe. Tropical grain legume Bull.1985; 30: 9 – 14.
  14. Carlos G. Cowpea: Post harvest Operation. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Rome, Italy. 2000.
  15. Santos JHR, Quindere MAW: Biology: Importance and management of Brazilian cowpea pests. In: (eds.) Watt, E. E. and J. P. P. Araujo Cowpea research in Brazil. Brazilia, IITA/EMBRAPA.1988; 267 – 300
  16. Ahmed AAI, Abd El-Salam AME, El-Hawary FMA: Persistence and biological activity of mint and garlic oils against the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch. (Homoptera: Aphididae). Egypt J Biol Pest Control. 2007; 17 (1): 19-22.
  17. Singh BB and Emechebe AM: Inheritance of Striga gesneraids resistance in cowpea genotype B 301. Crop Sci.1990; 30: 879-881.
  18. Tovignan S, Vodouline SD, Dinhan B: Cotton pesticides cause more deaths in Benin. Pesticide News 2001; 52: 12 – 14.
  19. Ntoukam G, Murdock LL and R.E. Shade: Managing insect pests of cowpea in storage, “Bean/Cowpea, Midcourse. Research Meeting, Senegal. 2000; 3 -4. http://www.canr.msu.edu/oerseas/cowpea/proceed
  20. Rajendran S and Sriranjini V: Plant products as fumigants for storedproduct insect control. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008; 44: 126 – 135.
  21. Jermy T: Feeding inhibitors and food preference in chewing phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl.1966; 9: 1 – 12.
  22. Dimetry NZ, Metwally HM, Abdou WL and Abdel-Hakim EA: Acceptability and anti-feedant effect of the drumstick “Moringa oleifera leaves towards the cotton leaf worm “Spodoptera littoralis ( Boisd.) Under laboratory conditions. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2017; 8 (4): 1006-1014.
  23. Nerio LS, Olivero-Verbal J and Stashenko EE: Repellent activities of essential oils from seven aromatic plants grown in Colombia against Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera). Journal of Stored Product Research 2009; (45):212-214
  24. Abbott WS: A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol 1925; (18): 265-267
  25. Finney D J: Probit analysis: a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. London: Cambridge University Press. 1971; 318
  26. Lwande W, Hassanalli A, Njorage PW, DElle Monache F and Jondiks JI: A new 6 a- hydroxyl petro-carpan with insect antifeedant and antifungal properties from the root of Tephrosia hildebrandtu.Vatle. Ins. Sci. Appl.1986; 6 (4): 537–541.
  27. Loebel F: Studies of the nutritive value of Moringa oleifera (Drumstick tree). Agric. Food Chem. 2002; 28:1163-1166.
  28. Shazal MEH: FABIS, News Letter.1990; 26, 30
  29. Joana O. Ilesanmi and Daniel T. Gungula: Preservation of Cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) Grains against Cowpea Bruchids (Callosobruchus maculatus) Using Neem and Moringa Seed oils. Int. J. of Agronomy 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/235280
  30. Croft BA: Arthropod biological control agents and pesticides. New York: John Wiley. 1990.
  31. Owusu-Akyaw M: Resistance of some varieties of cowpea V. unguiculata (L.) Walp) to attack by the cowpea storage weevil C. maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Kumasi University of Science and Technology 1987; 259.
  32. Adjadi O, Singh BB and Singh SR: Inheritance of bruchid resistance in cowpea. Crop Science.1985; 25: 740–742
  33. Lopez MD, Jordan MJ and Pascual-Villalobos MJ: Toxic compounds in essential oils of coriander, caraway and basil active against stored rice pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008; 44: 273-278.
  34. Eleirt U, Walters H and Mahrstedt A: The antibacterial properties of seeds of Moringa oleifera. Planta medica.1980; 42(1): 55
  35. Isman MB: Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Prot. 2000; 19: 603–608.